Quick Definition (30–60 words)
Follow the sun is a staffing and operational model that routes work to teams in time zones where business hours are active, ensuring near-continuous service coverage. Analogy: like relay runners passing a baton around a circular track so the race never stops. Formal: a distributed availability and handoff pattern for operational continuity.
What is Follow the sun?
Follow the sun is an operational and staffing model combined with technical patterns that route tasks, incidents, and operational responsibilities to teams located across different time zones to provide near-continuous coverage without requiring 24/7 single-location staffing.
What it is NOT:
- Not simply global on-call duplication.
- Not a single-technology solution; it is an organization + process + tooling pattern.
- Not automatic; requires clear handoffs, SLAs, and automation to work reliably.
Key properties and constraints:
- Temporal handoffs: ownership moves along predictable local-business-hour boundaries.
- Regional autonomy: local teams control immediate fixes within boundaries.
- Escalation paths: defined global escalation for unresolved or complex incidents.
- Data residency and compliance constraints may limit full automation.
- Latency and context transfer overhead across handoffs are real costs.
Where it fits in modern cloud/SRE workflows:
- Incident response orchestration integrated with CI/CD, observability, and runbooks.
- Enforced SLIs/SLOs with distributed incident routing and automated handoffs.
- Cloud-native patterns for multi-region deployment, global load balancing, and service mesh routing.
- AI/automation assists context transfer, triage summarization, and routine remediation.
A text-only diagram description readers can visualize:
- Global timeline circle with segments labeled APAC, EMEA, Americas; arrows moving clockwise representing handoffs; inner layer shows monitoring and automated routing; outer layer shows teams and escalation links.
Follow the sun in one sentence
Follow the sun is the coordinated practice of routing operational responsibilities to teams during their local business hours to maintain continuous effective coverage while minimizing burnout and cost.
Follow the sun vs related terms (TABLE REQUIRED)
| ID | Term | How it differs from Follow the sun | Common confusion |
|---|---|---|---|
| T1 | 24×7 on-call | Single team covers all hours rather than handing off | Often assumed same as 24×7 coverage |
| T2 | Follow the moon | Focuses on night-only support rather than local business hours | People mistake it for opposite model |
| T3 | Shift rotation | Rotates people inside one timezone not across regions | Thought to solve timezone coverage |
| T4 | Global NOC | Centralized operations center vs distributed ownership | Assumed identical to distributed teams |
| T5 | Follow the sun with Handoff Automation | Includes automated context transfer vs manual handoffs | Automation level often unclear |
| T6 | Multiregion deployment | Infrastructure placement not staffing model | Confused because both reduce latency |
| T7 | Active-active support | Multiple regions working concurrently not sequential handoffs | Mistaken for handoff-only model |
Row Details (only if any cell says “See details below”)
- None
Why does Follow the sun matter?
Business impact:
- Revenue: Faster incident remediation reduces downtime and lost transactions.
- Trust: Customers see consistent SLAs and regional responsiveness.
- Risk: Avoid concentration risk from single-region failures or single-team burnout.
Engineering impact:
- Incident reduction: Local expertise shortens MTTR for region-specific issues.
- Velocity: Teams can deploy and respond during their business hours, reducing review lag.
- Knowledge continuity risks if handoffs are poor.
SRE framing:
- SLIs/SLOs: Follow the sun aims to meet SLOs by improving coverage during peak regional hours.
- Error budgets: Distributed ownership allows targeted error budget consumption per region.
- Toil: Automate routine handoffs and remediation to reduce human toil.
- On-call: Moves from single-person 24×7 to predictable business-hour responsibilities and escalation.
3–5 realistic “what breaks in production” examples:
- DNS misconfiguration in a primary region causes failed API calls for customers in that region.
- Scheduled database migration leads to unexpected lock contention during overlapping deployments.
- Third-party payment gateway times out for a specific region during local peak hours.
- CI/CD pipeline misconfiguration pushes a bad image to multiple regions; localized rollbacks needed.
- IAM policy change accidentally revokes service account permissions within one region.
Where is Follow the sun used? (TABLE REQUIRED)
| ID | Layer/Area | How Follow the sun appears | Typical telemetry | Common tools |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| L1 | Edge and network | Regional routing and DDoS response handled locally | Traffic patterns latency and errors | Global LB WAF CDN |
| L2 | Service and app | Localized incident ownership for microservices | Request rate latency error rates | APM logs traces |
| L3 | Data and storage | Region-aware failover and read replicas | Replication lag consistency | DB metrics backups |
| L4 | Kubernetes | Regional clusters with local SRE owners | Pod restarts node health | K8s metrics kubelet logs |
| L5 | Serverless/PaaS | Region-specific alerts and scaling policies | Invocation duration error count | Cloud function metrics |
| L6 | CI/CD | Region-targeted pipelines and gated releases | Pipeline success times and failures | CI logs artifacts |
| L7 | Observability | Local dashboards and synthetic checks | SLI dashboards alert rates | Observability platforms |
| L8 | Security/Compliance | Local incident triage for security events | Auth failures audit logs | SIEM IAM tools |
| L9 | Customer support | Handoff for escalations during local hours | Ticketing SLA times | Ticketing systems |
| L10 | Business ops | Billing anomalies and fraud checks by region | Cost anomalies billing alerts | Cloud billing tools |
Row Details (only if needed)
- None
When should you use Follow the sun?
When it’s necessary:
- You have global customers in multiple active business regions needing rapid response.
- Region-specific regulations require local control or data residency.
- Latency-sensitive services require regional operational ownership.
When it’s optional:
- Low-traffic global services with tolerant SLAs.
- Teams comfortable with distributed async handoffs and asynchronous communication.
When NOT to use / overuse it:
- Small organizations lacking the staffing maturity to manage multiple regional teams.
- When the overhead of handoffs outweighs the benefits, e.g., very low incident frequency.
- Where security/compliance forbids cross-region access and automation.
Decision checklist:
- If user base in 3+ active regions AND MTTR impacts revenue -> adopt Follow the sun.
- If incidents are rare AND SLOs lenient -> consider async on-call with regional escalation.
- If compliance requires local custody AND capacity exists -> prefer local ownership.
Maturity ladder:
- Beginner: Single-region teams, documented handoffs, global escalation on-call.
- Intermediate: Multiple regional teams, automated summaries and partial routing, regional dashboards.
- Advanced: Automated incident routing, AI triage and handoff, active-active autonomy, regional CI/CD gating.
How does Follow the sun work?
Components and workflow:
- Monitoring and alerting that detects incidents and classifies by region/impact.
- Routing/orchestration layer mapping incidents to on-call regional teams during local hours.
- Handoff artifacts: incident summary, logs, traces, runbook links, and priority.
- Escalation paths to regional leads and global escalation team if unresolved.
- Automation for known remediations, rollback, or traffic shifting.
Data flow and lifecycle:
- Synthetic or real-user monitoring detects issue.
- Alerting system enriches with context and assigns to local timezone owner.
- Team receives incident, attempts remediation using runbooks and automation.
- If unresolved by X minutes, escalate to next level or region.
- Post-incident: automated report generated, ownership transfers to follow-up team for RCA.
Edge cases and failure modes:
- Midnight handoffs where fewer staff are available on the receiving side.
- Clock drift or DST misalignment causing routing errors.
- Network partitions that make regional teams unable to access necessary telemetry.
- Compliance blocks preventing cross-region remediation.
Typical architecture patterns for Follow the sun
- Regional Ownership Pattern: Each region runs full stack and owns incidents during local hours. Use when regulatory autonomy is needed.
- Handoff-Orchestrator Pattern: Central orchestration service routes incidents to region owners and holds the global view. Use when you need consistency.
- Active-Active with Local Failover: All regions active but local teams own incidents in local time windows. Use when low latency and redundancy required.
- Automation-first Pattern: Heavy automation for repetitive tasks reduces human handoffs. Use when repetitive operational tasks dominate.
- Tiered Support Pattern: Local teams handle Tier 1, centralized experts handle Tier 2/3 across timezones. Use when expertise is scarce.
Failure modes & mitigation (TABLE REQUIRED)
| ID | Failure mode | Symptom | Likely cause | Mitigation | Observability signal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F1 | Missed handoff | Incident unacknowledged after shift | Routing misconfiguration | Add retry and escalation | Alert ack time |
| F2 | Context loss | New team lacks incident history | Poor handoff artifact | Enforce structured summaries | Number of clarifying messages |
| F3 | Double work | Two regions act on same incident | No coordination locking | Add incident locks | Duplicate remediation events |
| F4 | Compliance block | Cannot execute cross-region fix | Data residency policy | Pre-approved cross-region processes | Access denied logs |
| F5 | Clock mismatch | Alerts go to wrong region | DST or timezone bug | Use UTC canonical times | Alert routing history |
| F6 | Automation failure | Automated remediation fails | Outdated playbook | Canary automation and rollbacks | Automation error counts |
| F7 | Escalation gap | No one to escalate to | Missing on-call assignment | Backup escalation paths | Escalation latency |
Row Details (only if needed)
- None
Key Concepts, Keywords & Terminology for Follow the sun
Term — 1–2 line definition — why it matters — common pitfall
- Follow the sun — Operational model handing work to local teams — Core concept — Confused with 24×7 single-team.
- Handoff — Transfer of ownership between teams — Critical for continuity — Informal handoffs cause context loss.
- Escalation policy — Rules for when to move to next-level support — Prevents stalls — Overly complex policies delay action.
- Runbook — Step-by-step remediation guide — Reduces MTTR — Stale runbooks mislead responders.
- Incident orchestration — Automated routing and lifecycle management — Scales coordination — Poor routing breaks coverage.
- SLI — Service Level Indicator — Measures reliability aspects — Wrong SLI yields wrong priorities.
- SLO — Service Level Objective — Target for SLIs — Drives error budget policy — Misaligned SLOs cause churn.
- Error budget — Allowance for unreliability — Enables risk-taking — Mismanaged budgets lead to outages.
- MTTR — Mean Time To Repair — Key operational metric — Ignoring detection time skews data.
- MTTA — Mean Time To Acknowledge — Shows alert responsiveness — False positives inflate MTTA.
- Synthetic monitoring — Simulated transactions to test availability — Early detection tool — Tests may not cover real paths.
- Real-user monitoring — Observes actual user requests — Reflects true impact — Sampling can miss issues.
- Global load balancer — Routes users to regions — Facilitates traffic shifts — Misconfig leads to misrouting.
- Active-active — Multiple regions serve traffic simultaneously — Lowers latency — State synchronization is hard.
- Active-passive — One region standby — Simplifies state — Failover delay possible.
- Traffic shifting — Gradual reroute of traffic to healthy regions — Reduces blast radius — Poor metrics can hide issues.
- Replica consistency — Data sync between regions — Ensures correctness — Stale reads if lagging.
- Read replica — Read-only copy of DB — Offloads reads — Writes inconsistency risk.
- Failover — Move traffic to alternate region — Recovery method — Risk of split-brain.
- Canary deployment — Gradual rollout to subset of users — Limits impact — Small sample may hide issues.
- Blue-green deploy — Swap full environments for safety — Quick rollback — Resource expensive.
- Observability — Measurement of system behavior — Supports rapid ops — Incomplete telemetry blinds teams.
- Tracing — Request path visibility — Speeds root cause analysis — High cardinality costs.
- Logging — Event records for systems — Forensics and debug — Log noise hides signals.
- Alert fatigue — Excessive alerts reducing attention — Teams ignore alerts — Tune thresholds and dedupe.
- Runbook automation — Scripts for remediation — Reduces toil — Unsafe automation causes outages.
- ChatOps — Operations in collaborative chat — Faster coordination — Info scattering risk.
- Timezone routing — Directing alerts by TZ — Ensures local teams active — DST handling necessary.
- Handoff summary — Structured incident notes — Preserves context — Free-text leads to ambiguity.
- Ownership transfer — Formal change of responsibility — Prevents overlap — Unclear ownership causes delays.
- SLA — Service Level Agreement — Business contract level — Operationally rigid SLAs hurt agility.
- NOC — Network operations center — Centralized ops team — Can be bottleneck for local expertise.
- Multi-cloud — Use of multiple cloud providers — Increases resilience — Increases complexity.
- RBAC — Role-based access control — Security for cross-region ops — Overly strict blocks fixes.
- SIEM — Security telemetry aggregation — Local security analytics — High noise if misconfigured.
- Chaos engineering — Controlled failures to test resilience — Validates handoffs — Poorly scoped chaos breaks SLAs.
- Postmortem — Blameless incident analysis — Drives improvement — Blame culture reduces reporting.
- RCA — Root cause analysis — Identifies root fixes — Superficial RCAs repeat failures.
- Observability SLO — Targets for telemetry health — Ensures visibility — Missing metrics reduce confidence.
- Burn rate — Speed of error budget consumption — Triggers action thresholds — Miscalculated burn rate misleads ops.
- Local autonomy — Regional teams’ authority to act — Speeds fixes — Too much autonomy fragments platform.
- Central governance — Global policies and standards — Ensures consistency — Heavy governance slows response.
- Cross-region playbook — Policy for cross-region fixes — Ensures compliance — Complex updates can lag.
- Incident lock — Prevents concurrent conflicting actions — Avoids double work — Locks can block progress if stuck.
- Context enrichment — Adding logs/traces to alerts — Reduces time to debug — Large enrichment payloads slow systems.
How to Measure Follow the sun (Metrics, SLIs, SLOs) (TABLE REQUIRED)
| ID | Metric/SLI | What it tells you | How to measure | Starting target | Gotchas |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M1 | Regional MTTR | Speed of fix per region | Time from alert to resolved per region | 30-90 minutes | Biased by detection delay |
| M2 | MTTA by region | Alert acknowledgement speed | Time from alert to first ack | 5-15 minutes | High noise inflates metric |
| M3 | Handoff latency | Time to transfer ownership | Time from resolved to next owner ack | <15 minutes | Manual handoffs vary widely |
| M4 | Incident reopens | Quality of resolution | Count of reopened incidents per region | <5% incidents | Post-incident fixes may reclassify |
| M5 | SLI availability | User-facing success rate | Successful requests divided by total | 99.9% See caveats | Varies by service criticality |
| M6 | Automation success rate | Remediation automation efficacy | Successful automated runs ratio | >90% for trivial tasks | Flaky automation hides failures |
| M7 | Alert noise ratio | Useful alerts vs total | Number of actionable alerts divided by total | >25% actionable | Poor dedupe skews ratio |
| M8 | Escalation latency | Time to escalate to global team | Time from threshold to escalation | <30 minutes | Missing on-call data delays it |
| M9 | Cross-region fix time | Time to complete cross-region action | Start to end of cross-region remediation | Varies / depends | Compliance windows affect it |
| M10 | Runbook usage | Fraction of incidents using runbooks | Count of incidents referencing runbook | >60% | Runbooks may be outdated |
Row Details (only if needed)
- M5: SLI availability starting target depends on service. Use conservative targets for critical systems and adjust by error budget.
- M9: Cross-region fix time varies by compliance and approvals; plan for long tails.
Best tools to measure Follow the sun
(Choose a concise set of industry tools representative in 2026)
Tool — Grafana
- What it measures for Follow the sun: Dashboards for SLIs, regional MTTR and alert rates.
- Best-fit environment: Multi-cloud and Kubernetes.
- Setup outline:
- Connect observability backends.
- Create regional dashboards and panels.
- Configure alerting rules and notification policies.
- Strengths:
- Flexible visualization and alerting.
- Wide plugin ecosystem.
- Limitations:
- Alert dedupe requires careful configuration.
- No native incident orchestration.
Tool — PagerDuty
- What it measures for Follow the sun: Incident lifecycle, MTTA, escalations, and on-call scheduling.
- Best-fit environment: Enterprises needing robust on-call orchestration.
- Setup outline:
- Define escalation policies per region.
- Integrate monitoring alerts.
- Set up schedules and overrides.
- Strengths:
- Strong routing and escalation features.
- Audit trail for handoffs.
- Limitations:
- Cost scales with seats.
- Complex configs can be hard to manage.
Tool — Honeycomb
- What it measures for Follow the sun: Distributed tracing and high-cardinality observability for regional debugging.
- Best-fit environment: Microservices and event-driven systems.
- Setup outline:
- Instrument services with tracing.
- Create queries for regional impact.
- Build trace-based dashboards.
- Strengths:
- Powerful ad-hoc analysis.
- Fast trace-level debugging.
- Limitations:
- Learning curve for advanced analyses.
- Cost depends on event volume.
Tool — BigQuery (or Cloud Data Warehouse)
- What it measures for Follow the sun: Aggregated telemetry and post-incident analytics.
- Best-fit environment: Organizations aggregating logs and metrics for analytics.
- Setup outline:
- Stream telemetry to warehouse.
- Create regional partitioned tables.
- Build SLO and SLA reports.
- Strengths:
- Scalability and complex queries.
- Good for postmortem analysis.
- Limitations:
- Query cost if unoptimized.
- Not real-time for immediate alerting.
Tool — OpsGenie
- What it measures for Follow the sun: Scheduling and alert routing similar to PagerDuty.
- Best-fit environment: Teams using Atlassian toolchain.
- Setup outline:
- Configure policies and escalation chains.
- Integrate with monitoring tools.
- Set timezone-aware schedules.
- Strengths:
- Strong integrations and scheduling.
- Cost-effective for certain teams.
- Limitations:
- Less mature analytics than dedicated incident platforms.
Tool — ServiceNow
- What it measures for Follow the sun: Ticket and incident management with enterprise governance.
- Best-fit environment: Large enterprises requiring ITSM processes.
- Setup outline:
- Map incident workflows to regional teams.
- Automate ticket creation from alerts.
- Configure SLAs and reporting.
- Strengths:
- Process and compliance support.
- Workflow automation.
- Limitations:
- Heavyweight and slow to change.
- Integration overhead.
Recommended dashboards & alerts for Follow the sun
Executive dashboard:
- Global SLO health by region: quick business-level view.
- Error budget burn rate per region: show risk windows.
- Major incidents active with customer impact: executive snapshot.
On-call dashboard:
- Alerts by severity and region: triage view.
- Open incidents with owner and time since alert: workload triage.
- Handoff queue and pending handoffs: shows items needing transfer.
Debug dashboard:
- Per-service traces and error logs for affected region: root cause tools.
- Recent deploys and configuration changes timeline: link to CI/CD.
- Resource metrics (CPU mem I/O) and network metrics: operational context.
Alerting guidance:
- Page vs ticket: page for severity S1/S2 impacting customers; ticket for S3 non-customer-facing issues.
- Burn-rate guidance: page when burn rate exceeds threshold and predicted SLO breach within business window.
- Noise reduction tactics: dedupe alerts at source, group related alerts into incidents, suppression windows for noisy maintenance, adaptive thresholds based on traffic.
Implementation Guide (Step-by-step)
1) Prerequisites – Global team structure with defined regional owners. – Observability and alerting in place across regions. – Runbooks and automation for common incidents. – Timezone-aware scheduling and on-call tools.
2) Instrumentation plan – Define SLIs for regional availability and latency. – Instrument traces, logs, and metrics with region metadata. – Ensure synthetic checks per region and critical path.
3) Data collection – Centralized telemetry store with region tags. – Local dashboards for shift teams and global view for managers. – Export events for post-incident analytics.
4) SLO design – Set regional SLOs reflecting local traffic and business impact. – Define shared global SLOs for cross-region features. – Error budgets per region and a policy for cross-region borrowing.
5) Dashboards – Build executive, on-call, and debug dashboards. – Provide per-service and per-region drilldowns. – Include deployment and changelog panels.
6) Alerts & routing – Create region-aware alerting rules. – Configure on-call schedules by local business hours. – Implement escalation policies and automatic retries.
7) Runbooks & automation – Author structured runbooks with automated steps where safe. – Implement Playbooks that include telemetry links. – Automate common fixes with safe rollback options.
8) Validation (load/chaos/game days) – Run chaos tests targeting handoffs and cross-region failovers. – Game days simulating multi-region incidents and evening handoffs. – Validate automation in staging before production.
9) Continuous improvement – Postmortems after each significant incident with action items. – Track runbook usage and update stale entries. – Adjust SLOs and routing based on measured outcomes.
Include checklists:
Pre-production checklist
- Region tagging across telemetry implemented.
- On-call schedules and escalation set up.
- Runbooks for top 10 incident types authored.
- Synthetic checks for critical paths in place.
- Cross-region access and compliance validation completed.
Production readiness checklist
- Dashboard panels validated and shared with teams.
- Alert suppression for planned maintenance configured.
- Automation tested in staging and canaryed in production.
- Backup escalation exists for holiday coverage.
Incident checklist specific to Follow the sun
- Acknowledge incident and assign local owner.
- Capture structured context for handoff.
- Attempt remediation per runbook and log steps.
- Escalate on time if thresholds exceeded.
- Produce automated post-incident summary and schedule RCA.
Use Cases of Follow the sun
Provide 8–12 use cases:
-
Global SaaS customer support – Context: SaaS with customers in APAC, EMEA, Americas. – Problem: Support response time lags outside a primary timezone. – Why Follow the sun helps: Local teams handle region-specific issues faster. – What to measure: Ticket TTR, regional CSAT, MTTR. – Typical tools: Ticketing system, PagerDuty, observability.
-
E-commerce peak season operations – Context: Retail spikes in multiple countries during promotions. – Problem: Incidents during local peaks cause lost revenue. – Why Follow the sun helps: Immediate regional response during local peaks. – What to measure: Checkout error rate per region, revenue loss per minute. – Typical tools: APM, global LB, automation for failover.
-
Financial services compliance incidents – Context: Regulatory events needing local handling. – Problem: Cross-region access restricted; centralized teams slow. – Why Follow the sun helps: Local teams with compliance knowledge act immediately. – What to measure: Time to remediate compliance incidents, audit trail completeness. – Typical tools: SIEM, ServiceNow, RBAC.
-
Multi-region Kubernetes clusters – Context: Microservices deployed to clusters across regions. – Problem: Regional cluster failures affecting local customers. – Why Follow the sun helps: K8s SREs in-region manage clusters during their day. – What to measure: Pod restart rate, node failures, MTTR per cluster. – Typical tools: Prometheus, Grafana, kube-state-metrics.
-
CDN and edge incidents – Context: Edge cache poisoning or regional CDN outages. – Problem: Traffic spike or configuration errors local to edges. – Why Follow the sun helps: Local teams aware of regional traffic patterns intervene. – What to measure: Cache hit ratio, edge latency, error rates. – Typical tools: CDN analytics, global LB, observability.
-
Serverless function regressions – Context: Functions deployed globally as managed PaaS. – Problem: Runtime or third-party API regressions impacting region. – Why Follow the sun helps: Adjust region-specific config or rollback quickly. – What to measure: Invocation failure rate, cold start times. – Typical tools: Cloud function metrics, deployment pipelines.
-
Data replication lag incidents – Context: Multi-region databases with read replicas. – Problem: Stale reads or consistency issues. – Why Follow the sun helps: Local DB teams troubleshoot replication during local hours. – What to measure: Replication lag, failed transactions. – Typical tools: DB monitoring, observability.
-
Security event triage – Context: Suspicious activity detected regionally. – Problem: Immediate local law and privacy needs require quick local action. – Why Follow the sun helps: Security analysts can triage and contain faster locally. – What to measure: Time to containment, number of false positives. – Typical tools: SIEM, endpoint detection, SOC playbooks.
-
Incident-driven feature rollbacks – Context: New features causing regional regressions. – Problem: Need fast rollbacks in specific regions. – Why Follow the sun helps: Regional teams can rollback while other regions stay unaffected. – What to measure: Rollback time, rollback success rate. – Typical tools: CI/CD, feature flags.
-
Customer escalations for SLAs – Context: Enterprise customers require quick remediation. – Problem: Local SLAs require response within business hours. – Why Follow the sun helps: Locally routed responses meet contractual obligations. – What to measure: SLA compliance, response time. – Typical tools: Ticketing, monitoring, reporting.
Scenario Examples (Realistic, End-to-End)
Scenario #1 — Kubernetes cluster regional outage
Context: A regional Kubernetes cluster reports node controller failures during local business hours.
Goal: Restore cluster function and return services to normal within regional SLO.
Why Follow the sun matters here: On-site regional SREs can access provider support and execute region-specific remediation during local workday.
Architecture / workflow: Regional cluster with regional monitoring, central observability, and CI/CD pipelines supporting the cluster.
Step-by-step implementation:
- Alert triggers regional on-call via PagerDuty.
- On-call acknowledges and opens incident in tracking tool.
- Runbook executed: check node autoscaling, drain faulty nodes, restart controller pods.
- If controllers fail, escalate to global K8s team.
- After fix, update dashboards and generate post-incident summary.
What to measure: Regional MTTR, pod restart rates, controller crash loops.
Tools to use and why: Prometheus/Grafana for metrics, PagerDuty for routing, kubectl and cloud provider console for remediation.
Common pitfalls: Using stale runbooks; lack of provider permissions.
Validation: Chaos test simulating controller failures and validating handoff.
Outcome: Local team recovers cluster within SLO and documents a missed provider quota check.
Scenario #2 — Serverless function third-party API outage (Serverless/PaaS)
Context: A third-party payments API degrades in EMEA during a promotional campaign.
Goal: Maintain checkout success while minimizing revenue impact.
Why Follow the sun matters here: EMEA team can immediately enable fallback payment path and coordinate with finance during local hours.
Architecture / workflow: Global serverless functions with region-specific configs and feature flags for fallback flows.
Step-by-step implementation:
- Synthetic checks detect increased payment failures in EMEA.
- Alert routes to EMEA on-call.
- EMEA team flips feature flag to fallback payment provider and monitors success.
- Global team investigates third-party SLA and coordinates remediation.
- Post-incident: adjust retry logic and add synthetic checks.
What to measure: Payment success rate per region, rollback time.
Tools to use and why: Cloud function metrics, feature flag platform, synthetic monitoring.
Common pitfalls: Missing fallback credentials in region.
Validation: Load test fallback path and run localized chaos.
Outcome: Fallback reduces revenue loss and identifies missing credentials to fix.
Scenario #3 — Multi-region incident response and postmortem
Context: A cascading deploy failure results in partial outages across regions during handoff intervals.
Goal: Resolve outages and root cause analysis without finger-pointing.
Why Follow the sun matters here: Incidents spanned multiple shifts; smooth handoffs and centralized RCA required.
Architecture / workflow: Global orchestration service with regional deployments and centralized logging.
Step-by-step implementation:
- Incident raised and routed to region where failure started.
- Regional team mitigates; global team coordinates cross-region rollback.
- Handoff summaries produced at shift changes.
- Postmortem scheduled with representatives from all regions.
- Action items assigned and tracked across regional teams.
What to measure: Handoff latency, action item completion rate, cross-region MTTR.
Tools to use and why: Incident platform, centralized logging, collaboration tools.
Common pitfalls: Incomplete handoff notes leading to wasted time.
Validation: Tabletop exercises simulating shift overlaps.
Outcome: RCA identifies integration test gap and updated CI gates implemented.
Scenario #4 — Cost/performance trade-off (Cost/Perf)
Context: Traffic spikes cause autoscaling to spin up cross-region capacity, increasing cost alerts during off-peak in some regions.
Goal: Balance latency needs and cost constraints while maintaining SLOs.
Why Follow the sun matters here: Regional teams can tune autoscaling and capacity locally during their hours.
Architecture / workflow: Service deployed in multiple regions with autoscaling policies and central billing alerts.
Step-by-step implementation:
- Cost alert triggers regional operations and finance.
- Regional team examines load and scales down non-critical components after business-hours windows.
- Implement scheduled scaling policies per region aligned to local traffic patterns.
- Monitor SLOs to ensure no user impact.
What to measure: Cost per region, tail latency, scaling events.
Tools to use and why: Cloud billing dashboards, APM, autoscaler metrics.
Common pitfalls: Aggressive scaling down causing latency spikes.
Validation: Simulate traffic and scaling behaviors with load tests.
Outcome: Cost optimized while maintaining SLOs with scheduled scaling rules.
Common Mistakes, Anti-patterns, and Troubleshooting
List 15–25 mistakes with Symptom -> Root cause -> Fix (include at least 5 observability pitfalls).
- Symptom: Alerts unacknowledged overnight -> Root cause: No backup escalation -> Fix: Add secondary regional escalation.
- Symptom: Repeated incident reopenings -> Root cause: Superficial fixes -> Fix: Enforce thorough root cause checks before close.
- Symptom: Conflicting actions from two regions -> Root cause: No incident lock -> Fix: Implement incident locking in orchestration.
- Symptom: High MTTA -> Root cause: Alert noise -> Fix: Triage and dedupe alerts; tune thresholds.
- Symptom: Missing context on handoff -> Root cause: Free-text handoffs -> Fix: Structured handoff templates and automated enrichment.
- Symptom: Automation-induced outages -> Root cause: Unchecked automated playbooks -> Fix: Canary automation and kill switches.
- Symptom: Runbooks ignored -> Root cause: Outdated or hard-to-follow runbooks -> Fix: Regular runbook reviews and drills.
- Symptom: Inconsistent SLOs across regions -> Root cause: No governance -> Fix: Central SLO policy with regional adjustments.
- Symptom: Observability blind spots -> Root cause: Missing telemetry tags for region -> Fix: Add region tags to all telemetry.
- Symptom: Logs missing for incidents -> Root cause: Sampling or retention config -> Fix: Adjust sampling for incident windows and retention policies.
- Symptom: Traces incomplete -> Root cause: Instrumentation gaps -> Fix: Standardize tracing libraries and injection.
- Symptom: Dashboard overload -> Root cause: Many unfocused panels -> Fix: Curate dashboards per role and purpose.
- Symptom: Cost spikes unexpectedly -> Root cause: Uncontrolled autoscaling across regions -> Fix: Scheduled scaling and budget alerts.
- Symptom: Escalation delays -> Root cause: No covered on-call shifts during holidays -> Fix: Holiday overrides and backups.
- Symptom: Compliance block stalls fixes -> Root cause: No pre-approved cross-region processes -> Fix: Define compliant cross-region playbooks.
- Symptom: Low runbook usage -> Root cause: Hard to find runbooks -> Fix: Surface runbooks directly in alert payloads.
- Symptom: Duplicate incidents -> Root cause: Multiple monitoring sources alert separately -> Fix: Correlate and consolidate alerts upstream.
- Symptom: Poor cross-region communication -> Root cause: No overlap period for handoffs -> Fix: Create short overlap windows during shift changes.
- Symptom: High alarm fatigue -> Root cause: Low-value alerts -> Fix: Convert low-value alerts to tickets and reduce pages.
- Symptom: Security incidents mishandled -> Root cause: Lack of region-aware SOC playbooks -> Fix: Local SOC playbooks and periodic training.
- Symptom: Delayed postmortems -> Root cause: Busy regional teams -> Fix: Enforce timelines and lightweight templates.
- Symptom: Missing root cause data -> Root cause: Telemetry not retained long enough -> Fix: Extend retention for incident windows.
- Symptom: Inadequate validation -> Root cause: No game days -> Fix: Regular game days across regions.
- Symptom: Handoff summaries inconsistent -> Root cause: No enforced template -> Fix: Structured fields and automated summary generation.
- Symptom: Observability cost explosion -> Root cause: High-cardinality metrics unchecked -> Fix: Instrumentation review and sampling strategies.
Observability-specific pitfalls noted above include missing telemetry tags, logs missing, traces incomplete, dashboard overload, and telemetry cost spikes.
Best Practices & Operating Model
Ownership and on-call:
- Prefer regional ownership with a clear global escalation path.
- Keep on-call rotas predictable and aligned with local business hours.
- Provide compensation and downtime for on-call duties.
Runbooks vs playbooks:
- Runbooks: step-by-step for specific failures; keep brief and tested.
- Playbooks: higher-level decision trees for complex issues; include escalation and communication steps.
Safe deployments (canary/rollback):
- Use canaries and automated rollbacks tied to SLO violations.
- Automate gradual rollouts and incorporate regional gating.
Toil reduction and automation:
- Automate repetitive handoffs and incident enrichment.
- Use ChatOps to reduce context switching.
Security basics:
- Least privilege for cross-region operations.
- Audit trails for cross-region actions.
- Pre-approved secure delegation for emergency actions.
Weekly/monthly routines:
- Weekly: Review high-severity incidents and outstanding action items.
- Monthly: Review SLOs and error budgets; runbook refresh.
- Quarterly: Game days and cross-region drills.
What to review in postmortems related to Follow the sun:
- Handoff quality and timing metrics.
- Automation success/failure rates.
- Error budget impacts per region.
- Action item closure and effectiveness.
Tooling & Integration Map for Follow the sun (TABLE REQUIRED)
| ID | Category | What it does | Key integrations | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| I1 | Monitoring | Detects incidents and metrics | Alerting APM tracing logs | Region tagging required |
| I2 | Incident platform | Orchestrates incidents and handoffs | PagerDuty ticketing chat | Use timezone schedules |
| I3 | Observability | Traces logs and metrics | Dashboards APM | High-cardinality support helpful |
| I4 | CI/CD | Deploy and rollback code | Artifact registry monitoring | Support regional pipelines |
| I5 | Feature flags | Toggle region behavior | CI/CD runtime | Include emergency toggles |
| I6 | Runbook store | Host runbooks and playbooks | Incident platform chat | Versioned and searchable |
| I7 | Automation engine | Execute scripted remediations | Cloud APIs monitoring | Provide kill switches |
| I8 | Ticketing/ITSM | Manage incident tickets | Incident platform reporting | Useful for postmortems |
| I9 | Security tools | SOC and SIEM functions | Logs alerting IAM | Region-aware rules needed |
| I10 | Billing analytics | Cost telemetry and alerts | Cloud provider APIs | Tie to regional cost centers |
Row Details (only if needed)
- None
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
What exactly is Follow the sun?
Follow the sun is a coordinated operational model routing work to teams in their local business hours to maintain continuous coverage while minimizing burnout.
Is Follow the sun the same as 24×7 on-call?
No. 24×7 on-call is a single-team continuous duty model; Follow the sun distributes ownership across regions during local hours.
How do you prevent knowledge loss during handoffs?
Use structured handoff templates, automated enrichment (logs traces links), and short overlap windows for verbal sync when needed.
Can automation replace human handoffs?
Automation can handle repetitive tasks and context transfer but humans remain essential for complex judgement decisions.
How do you measure success of a Follow the sun implementation?
Measure regional MTTR MTTA SLO attainment error budget burn and quality of handoffs using incident metrics and postmortems.
What are the biggest risks?
Context loss, automation errors, compliance blocks, and escalation gaps are top risks.
How do you handle DST and timezone changes?
Use UTC canonical times internally and timezone-aware scheduling that accounts for DST transitions.
Do you need identical stacks in all regions?
Not necessarily. Similar operational patterns are required but full stack parity depends on latency, compliance, and cost trade-offs.
How do you manage sensitive data across regions?
Follow compliance and data residency rules; use pre-approved cross-region playbooks or local-only remediation where required.
What handoff artifacts are essential?
Structured summary, recent logs, traces, recent deploy changelog, and active remediation steps are essential.
How do you avoid alert fatigue?
Tune thresholds, dedupe correlated alerts, convert low-priority alerts to tickets, and maintain suppression for noisy maintenance.
Should SLOs be global or regional?
Both. Regional SLOs reflect local user impact; global SLOs capture system-wide reliability expectations.
How often should runbooks be tested?
At least quarterly, and after any major platform change; game days validate effectiveness.
What tooling is mandatory?
No single mandatory tool; however, you need monitoring, an incident platform, observability, and scheduling/escallation tooling.
How to handle holidays and small regional teams?
Use backup escalation, on-call swaps, or temporary cross-region coverage agreements.
How do you keep postmortems timely across regions?
Enforce timelines with lightweight templates and schedule cross-region meetings in overlapping hours when possible.
What’s the role of AI in Follow the sun?
AI can auto-summarize incidents, suggest remediation steps, and predict error budget burn; oversight and verification still required.
Conclusion
Follow the sun is a mature operational approach combining people, process, and automation to provide continuous, region-aware service coverage. It reduces latency to resolution, aligns response with customer locales, and distributes operational burden when done with clear governance, tooling, and measurement.
Next 7 days plan (5 bullets):
- Day 1: Audit telemetry for region tags and onboard missing metadata.
- Day 2: Define regional SLOs and error budget policy draft.
- Day 3: Create structured handoff template and embed in alerts.
- Day 4: Configure timezone-aware on-call schedules and escalation paths.
- Day 5: Run a short tabletop handoff exercise and note gaps.
Appendix — Follow the sun Keyword Cluster (SEO)
- Primary keywords
- Follow the sun
- follow the sun model
- follow the sun SRE
- follow the sun operations
-
follow the sun staffing
-
Secondary keywords
- regional on-call
- global incident routing
- time zone handoff
- incident orchestration
- regional SLOs
- handoff automation
- follow the sun architecture
- cross-region escalation
- timezone-aware scheduling
-
runbook automation
-
Long-tail questions
- What is follow the sun in SRE
- How to implement follow the sun in Kubernetes
- Follow the sun vs 24×7 on-call pros and cons
- How to measure follow the sun success metrics
- Best practices for handoffs in follow the sun
- How to automate handoffs between regions
- How to prevent context loss during follow the sun handoffs
- How to design SLOs for follow the sun operations
- How to run a game day for follow the sun
- What tools support follow the sun incident routing
- How to handle DST with follow the sun schedules
- How to secure cross-region remediation
- What observability signals are critical for follow the sun
- How to set escalation policies for follow the sun
-
How to balance cost and performance with follow the sun
-
Related terminology
- regional ownership
- on-call schedule
- incident lock
- automation engine
- chaos engineering
- synthetic monitoring
- real-user monitoring
- global load balancer
- active-active deployment
- blue-green deployment
- canary deployment
- synthetic checks
- error budget
- MTTR metrics
- MTTA metrics
- runbook store
- playbook
- observability SLO
- SIEM regional rules
- RBAC cross-region