Quick Definition (30–60 words)
Metric scraping is an automated pull-based collection of numeric time series from endpoints for monitoring and alerting. Analogy: metric scraping is like periodic meter-reading of building utilities where a collector walks and records counters. Formal: a pull-oriented telemetry acquisition pattern exposing HTTP endpoints returning metrics in machine-readable formats.
What is Metric scraping?
Metric scraping is the process where a central collector periodically requests metric data from target endpoints, parses the response, and stores time-series data in an observability backend. It is not push aggregation, log ingestion, or distributed tracing collection, though it often complements those systems.
Key properties and constraints:
- Pull model: collector initiates requests on schedules.
- Targets must expose an endpoint or exporter.
- Works well with stateless scraping frequency and retry semantics.
- Sensitive to network topology, firewalls, and authentication.
- Rate and cardinality limits directly affect performance and cost.
Where it fits in modern cloud/SRE workflows:
- Primary mechanism for collecting application, infrastructure, and custom business metrics.
- Feeds SLIs and SLOs driving alerting and incident response.
- Used by autoscaling and cost-control automation.
- Integrates with CI/CD to verify runtime metrics after deployments.
Diagram description (text-only):
- Collector scheduler polls targets at configured intervals.
- Target endpoint responds with a metrics payload.
- Collector parses metrics, converts to internal model, and writes to TSDB.
- TSDB provides query APIs, alerting engine consumes query results, dashboards visualize.
- Optional: relabeling, scraping proxies, scrape adapters, and remote-write to managed services.
Metric scraping in one sentence
Metric scraping is a scheduled pull mechanism where a central scraper requests metric endpoints to gather time-series data for storage, alerting, and analysis.
Metric scraping vs related terms (TABLE REQUIRED)
| ID | Term | How it differs from Metric scraping | Common confusion |
|---|---|---|---|
| T1 | Pushgateway | Push-based buffer for short-lived jobs | Scraping still used to collect from Pushgateway |
| T2 | Log ingestion | Textual event stream processing | Logs contain raw events not time series |
| T3 | Tracing | Distributed span collection | Traces record causal paths not periodic metrics |
| T4 | Push metrics | Targets send data proactively | Scraping collector pulls from targets |
| T5 | Remote write | TSDB export protocol | Remote write is backend replication not collection |
| T6 | Metrics exporter | Component exposing metrics | Exporter is a target for scrapers |
| T7 | Sidecar collection | Local agent push pattern | Sidecar can be scraped or push to central |
| T8 | Metric aggregation | Summarization step | Aggregation reduces cardinality post scrape |
| T9 | Instrumentation | Application measurement code | Instrumentation exposes metrics for scraping |
| T10 | Service discovery | Source list for scrapers | Discovery feeds scrapers with endpoints |
Row Details (only if any cell says “See details below”)
- None
Why does Metric scraping matter?
Business impact:
- Revenue: timely SLI breaches detected by scraped metrics avoid revenue loss from outages.
- Trust: accurate customer-facing metrics maintain contractual and brand trust.
- Risk: missing metrics can delay detection leading to larger incident costs.
Engineering impact:
- Incident reduction: early detection of regressions through scrape-derived alerts.
- Velocity: standardized scraping reduces friction for developers to onboard metrics.
- Cost-control: scraping frequency and cardinality choices directly affect storage and cloud bills.
SRE framing:
- SLIs: scraped availability and latency metrics form precise SLIs.
- SLOs: long-term trends and error budgets rely on high-fidelity scraped metrics.
- Error budget: accurate scrape reliability reduces false burn.
- Toil/on-call: automated scraping health checks and runbooks lower manual toil.
What breaks in production — realistic examples:
- Missing scrape target registration after a deployment leads to blindspots and missed throttling behavior.
- High metric cardinality from user IDs causes backend overload and alerts flood.
- Misconfigured scrape interval combined with high data volumes spikes cloud storage costs unexpectedly.
- Network policies block scraper to new workload subnet causing partial visibility.
- Insecure exposers leak internal metrics due to unauthenticated endpoints.
Where is Metric scraping used? (TABLE REQUIRED)
| ID | Layer/Area | How Metric scraping appears | Typical telemetry | Common tools |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| L1 | Edge and network | Scraping network devices and proxies | Latency counters and throughput | Prometheus exporters |
| L2 | Service and app | App endpoints expose metrics /metrics | Request rate and error rate | Client libraries and exporters |
| L3 | Orchestration | Kubernetes metrics endpoints and cAdvisor | Pod CPU memory and container metrics | Kubernetes integration |
| L4 | Cloud infra | VM and instance exporters | Host-level metrics and disk IOPS | Node exporters |
| L5 | Storage and DB | Exporters for DB servers | Query latency and connection counts | DB exporters |
| L6 | Serverless and PaaS | Managed services expose metrics or need adapters | Invocation counts and cold starts | Managed service adapters |
| L7 | CI/CD and automation | Pipeline steps expose runtime metrics | Job duration and success rate | CI exporters |
| L8 | Security and compliance | Metrics for auth events and anomalies | Failed logins and policy violations | Security exporters |
| L9 | Observability platform | Collector and remote write endpoints | Scrape success and drop rates | Collector software |
Row Details (only if needed)
- None
When should you use Metric scraping?
When it’s necessary:
- Targets expose stable HTTP endpoints suitable for pull.
- You need precise scrape intervals and consistent timestamps.
- Service discovery works reliably for dynamic environments like Kubernetes.
- You require lower client complexity; central control simplifies auth and relabeling.
When it’s optional:
- For short-lived batch jobs where push mechanisms may be simpler.
- When using platforms that already push metrics to a managed backend.
When NOT to use / overuse it:
- Extremely high-cardinality per-request metrics that would overwhelm TSDB.
- Environments where network restrictions prevent pull or introduce excessive latency.
- When privacy/compliance requires push through secure collectors instead.
Decision checklist:
- If targets run long-lived and expose endpoints AND service discovery available -> use scraping.
- If workloads are ephemeral with irregular lifetime AND can push securely -> consider push.
- If metrics cardinality > expected TSDB capacity -> aggregate or sample before scrape.
Maturity ladder:
- Beginner: Scrape basic host and HTTP metrics at 15–60s, use node and app exporters.
- Intermediate: Add relabeling, service discovery, and basic SLOs with alerting.
- Advanced: Use scrape proxies, multi-tenancy remote write, adaptive scraping rates, and autoscaling driven by scraped metrics.
How does Metric scraping work?
Components and workflow:
- Service discovery provides a list of endpoints (static files, DNS, Kubernetes API, cloud metadata).
- Scraper scheduler determines which targets to poll and when.
- HTTP client requests target endpoint, handling TLS and auth.
- Response parser converts payload to internal metric model.
- Relabeling and metric transformations apply.
- Metrics are written to a TSDB or forwarded via remote-write.
- Storage indexes and retention policies manage lifecycle.
- Alerting engine queries TSDB for SLIs and triggers incidents.
- Dashboards visualize scraped metrics.
Data flow and lifecycle:
- Ingestion: scrape -> parse -> transform -> write.
- Retention: rollups, downsampling, and retention windows reduce costs.
- Query: real-time dashboards and historical queries access storage.
- Archive: infrequently queried metrics may be archived or export to cold storage.
Edge cases and failure modes:
- Target returns inconsistent timestamps or resets counters.
- Network partitions cause intermittent scrape failures.
- Metric explosions due to new instrumentation adding high cardinality.
- Format changes or incorrect content types break parsers.
Typical architecture patterns for Metric scraping
- Centralized scraper: single cluster of scrapers polls all targets; use when control and consistent relabeling are required.
- Local node-level agent with central ingestion: lightweight agent scrapes local services then forwards; use for reducing cross-network calls.
- Sidecar exporters: colocated sidecar exposes aggregated metrics for ephemeral pods; use in Kubernetes for pod-local metrics.
- Service-discovery-driven scraping: scrapers subscribe to orchestrator APIs to discover dynamic targets; use for autoscaled environments.
- Scrape proxy / gateway: aggregator that proxies scrapes across network boundaries; use for secure cross-VPC or multi-tenant setups.
- Hybrid push-scrape: for short-lived jobs, push to a pushgateway or collector which is scraped by central system.
Failure modes & mitigation (TABLE REQUIRED)
| ID | Failure mode | Symptom | Likely cause | Mitigation | Observability signal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F1 | Target missing | Sudden metric drop | Service discovery mismatch | Automate SD and alerts | Scrape failure rate |
| F2 | High cardinality | TSDB OOM or slow queries | Unbounded labels | Relabel and aggregate | Series churn |
| F3 | Network blocked | Intermittent scrape timeouts | Firewall or policy | Use scrape proxy | Increased latency |
| F4 | Format change | Parser errors and missing metrics | App changed metric format | Versioned endpoints | Parser error logs |
| F5 | Auth failure | 401 or 403 responses | Credential rotation | Use managed auth and certs | Authorization error rate |
| F6 | Scraper overload | Timeouts and partial writes | Too many targets per scraper | Horizontal scale scrapers | Scraper CPU and latency |
| F7 | Timestamp issues | Counter resets and jumps | Client time skew | Use monotonic counters | Out-of-order samples |
| F8 | Cost spike | Billing increase | High retention or frequency | Adjust retention or sampling | Storage ingest rate |
Row Details (only if needed)
- None
Key Concepts, Keywords & Terminology for Metric scraping
Glossary (40+ terms). Each entry: Term — 1–2 line definition — why it matters — common pitfall
- Aggregation — Summarizing multiple series into a single metric — reduces cardinality and cost — over-aggregation loses signal.
- Alerting rule — Query-based trigger to notify on SLI breach — drives incident response — noisy rules cause alert fatigue.
- Cardinality — Number of unique series combinations — impacts storage and performance — unbounded labels break systems.
- Collector — Software that performs scraping and forwarding — central to collection pipeline — single point of failure if not scaled.
- Counter — Monotonic increasing metric type — used for rates and throughput — incorrect reset handling skews rates.
- Counter reset — When a counter restarts at zero — must be handled to avoid negative rates — time skew complicates detection.
- Dashboard — Visual representation of metrics — aids contextual decision-making — cluttered dashboards hide signal.
- Exporter — Adapter exposing application or system metrics — enables scraping — misconfigured exporter exposes secrets.
- Gauge — Metric that can go up or down — used for current resource states — sampling intervals may alias values.
- Histogram — Bucketed distribution metric — useful for latency percentiles — misaligned buckets hide tail behavior.
- Instrumentation — Code to record metrics — enables observability — inconsistent names cause fragmentation.
- Job label — Scrape job identifier — organizes targets — poor labels complicate query filtering.
- Label — Key-value pair for series identity — essential for grouping and slicing — high-cardinality labels are dangerous.
- Monotonic — Property of counters that only increase — supports rate calculations — not all metrics are monotonic.
- OpenMetrics — Standard exposition format for metrics — encourages interoperability — older formats may lack features.
- Pushgateway — Buffer for push metrics from ephemeral jobs — bridges push and pull models — misuse leads to stale metrics.
- Pull model — Collector-initiated telemetry retrieval — centralizes control — not suitable for highly ephemeral services.
- Push model — Targets send metrics to collector — useful for short-lived jobs — requires secure ingestion endpoints.
- Rate — Change per unit time computed from counters — core for SLOs — incorrect windows cause misleading rates.
- Relabeling — Transforming labels during scrape or ingestion — filters and standardizes metrics — incorrect rules drop data.
- Remote write — Protocol to forward metrics to remote storage — enables multi-cluster shipping — network costs apply.
- Scrape interval — Frequency of pull attempts — balances fidelity and cost — low intervals increase storage.
- Scrape timeout — Time limit for requests — prevents hangs — too short causes false failures.
- Scraper scheduler — Component that manages scrape timings — impacts load distribution — scheduler jitter affects alignment.
- Series — Unique metric with labels — unit of storage — explosion leads to capacity failure.
- SLI — Service Level Indicator derived from metrics — measures user-visible quality — poor definition yields false comfort.
- SLO — Service Level Objective based on SLIs — drives error budgets — unrealistic SLOs cause noisy alerts.
- Storage retention — Time-series retention window — balances cost and historical analysis — truncating history hurts RCA.
- Target — Endpoint to be scraped — must be reachable and expose metrics — unregistered targets create blindspots.
- TLS — Secure transport for scrape traffic — secures metrics transport — misconfigured certs block scrapes.
- Time series database (TSDB) — Stores metric samples — optimized for time-series queries — wrong schema affects performance.
- Timestamp — Sample ingestion time or metric timestamp — needed for ordering — inconsistent timestamps cause gaps.
- Topology — Network and compute layout — affects scrape reachability — dynamic topology complicates discovery.
- Token/Bearer — Auth credential used for scraping — secures endpoints — expired tokens cause 401 errors.
- Up metric — Simple success indicator for scrape targets — quick health check — missing up hides visibility.
- Variable sampling — Adaptive sampling to reduce volume — controls cost — may reduce accuracy.
- Windowing — Time windows used for rate and percentile calculations — affects sensitivity — too long windows delay detection.
- Write amplification — Multiple writes per metric due to labels — increases storage — reduce by dedup and aggregation.
- Zero series — No data points for a metric — indicates visibility gap — could be scrape failure or metric removal.
How to Measure Metric scraping (Metrics, SLIs, SLOs) (TABLE REQUIRED)
| ID | Metric/SLI | What it tells you | How to measure | Starting target | Gotchas |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M1 | Scrape success rate | Health of collection | Successful scrapes divided by attempts | 99.9% | Short outages mask long gaps |
| M2 | Scrape latency | Time to fetch metrics | Histogram of scrape durations | p95 < 200ms | Large payloads skew latency |
| M3 | Series churn rate | New series per minute | Count of series created | Low steady growth | Sudden spikes indicate cardinality issues |
| M4 | Samples ingested per sec | Ingest pressure | TSDB ingest rate | Varies by backend | Spikes may be transient |
| M5 | Metrics storage per day | Cost driver | Bytes stored per day | Align with budget | High label counts inflate size |
| M6 | Scraper CPU usage | Resource needs | CPU usage of scraper pods | p95 < 70% | Bursty scrapes can spike CPU |
| M7 | Missing critical SLI data | Data gaps for SLIs | Boolean per SLI if samples present | 0% missing | Partial slAs may still appear healthy |
| M8 | Relabel hit/miss | Relabel rules effectiveness | Count of relabel transformations | Low miss rate | Wrong rules drop series |
| M9 | Remote write latency | Time to forward metrics | Tail latency of remote write | p99 < 1s | Network issues increase latency |
| M10 | Alert false positive rate | Alerting quality | False alerts divided by alerts | < 5% | Poor SLO thresholds cause noise |
Row Details (only if needed)
- None
Best tools to measure Metric scraping
Tool — Prometheus
- What it measures for Metric scraping: Scrape success, latency, up metric, series count.
- Best-fit environment: Kubernetes, cloud VMs, self-hosted TSDB.
- Setup outline:
- Configure scrape jobs and service discovery.
- Apply relabel_configs for label hygiene.
- Use Prometheus metrics for scraper self-observability.
- Tune scrape_interval and timeout per job.
- Remote write to long-term storage if needed.
- Strengths:
- Mature ecosystem and exporter compatibility.
- Native scraper with detailed self-metrics.
- Limitations:
- Single-node TSDB limitations at scale unless sharded.
- Operational complexity for long retention.
Tool — OpenTelemetry Collector
- What it measures for Metric scraping: Can act as a scrape proxy and collect metrics for remote write.
- Best-fit environment: Hybrid clouds and multi-tenant setups.
- Setup outline:
- Deploy collector with scrape receiver or Prometheus receiver.
- Configure pipelines for transform and export.
- Centralize auth and relabeling.
- Strengths:
- Extensible processors and exporters.
- Vendor-agnostic integrations.
- Limitations:
- Additional configuration complexity.
- Some features vary by receiver exporter implementations.
Tool — Managed monitoring services
- What it measures for Metric scraping: Provides scrape metrics when using their agents or remote write.
- Best-fit environment: Organizations preferring managed backend.
- Setup outline:
- Install agent or configure remote-write.
- Map labels and metrics to service constructs.
- Configure retention and alerting.
- Strengths:
- Lower ops overhead.
- Elastic scaling.
- Limitations:
- Varies by vendor and may be opaque.
- Costs can escalate with high cardinality.
Tool — Grafana Agent
- What it measures for Metric scraping: Lightweight scraper, forwards to backends.
- Best-fit environment: Edge and constrained environments.
- Setup outline:
- Deploy agent on hosts or sidecars.
- Configure scrape targets and forwarders.
- Use local buffering for intermittent connectivity.
- Strengths:
- Low resource footprint.
- Integrates with remote storage.
- Limitations:
- Fewer enterprise features compared to full Prometheus.
- Configuration quirks with relabeling.
Tool — Cloud-native exporters (node exporter, cAdvisor, etc)
- What it measures for Metric scraping: Host and container metrics.
- Best-fit environment: Server and containerized workloads.
- Setup outline:
- Deploy exporters on hosts or via DaemonSet in Kubernetes.
- Expose /metrics endpoint and secure as needed.
- Ensure version compatibility.
- Strengths:
- Detailed OS and container metrics.
- Wide community support.
- Limitations:
- Default metrics may be verbose.
- Need careful label hygiene to avoid cardinality.
Recommended dashboards & alerts for Metric scraping
Executive dashboard:
- Panels:
- Overall scrape success rate: quick health indicator.
- Total series count and storage estimate: cost visibility.
- Major SLI health overview: business impact.
- Alert burn rate summary: shows error budget consumption.
- Why: Provides leadership with concise health and cost signals.
On-call dashboard:
- Panels:
- Scrape failures by job and target: triage origins.
- Scrape latency heatmap: identify slow endpoints.
- Top high-cardinality metrics: find causes of load.
- Recent alert list and incident timeline.
- Why: Equips on-call with immediate diagnostic views.
Debug dashboard:
- Panels:
- Scraper CPU, memory, and goroutine counts.
- HTTP response status distribution from targets.
- Parser error logs and metric sample previews.
- Relabeling matches and drops.
- Why: Deep troubleshooting for collection pipeline issues.
Alerting guidance:
- Page vs ticket:
- Page for SLI-based outages and scrape system failures affecting critical SLIs.
- Ticket for non-urgent metric quality degradations not impacting SLIs.
- Burn-rate guidance:
- Trigger burn rate alerts when error budget consumption exceeds short-term thresholds like 2x expected burn.
- Noise reduction tactics:
- Deduplicate alerts by grouping labels.
- Use alert suppression during known maintenance windows.
- Implement alert correlation and dedupe pipelines.
Implementation Guide (Step-by-step)
1) Prerequisites – Inventory of targets and expected metrics. – Service discovery sources and network topology map. – Observability backend capacity plan and budget. – Authentication and TLS requirements.
2) Instrumentation plan – Define metric names, types, units, and labels. – Establish naming conventions and label cardinality limits. – Implement client libraries and exporters with consistent schema.
3) Data collection – Configure scrape jobs and service discovery. – Apply relabeling to normalize labels. – Determine scrape_interval and timeout per job. – Deploy local agents or sidecars where needed.
4) SLO design – Define SLIs derived from scraped metrics. – Set SLOs with realistic windows and error budgets. – Map alert thresholds to SLO burn policies.
5) Dashboards – Build executive, on-call, and debug dashboards. – Implement drill-down links and context panels. – Validate dashboards with real incidents and replay data.
6) Alerts & routing – Create alert rules tied to SLOs and scrape health. – Configure on-call routing and escalation policies. – Implement dedupe and suppression to manage noise.
7) Runbooks & automation – Write runbooks for common scrape failures and cardinality issues. – Automate remediation for common failures like restart of exporter. – Integrate automatic labeling and discovery in CI/CD.
8) Validation (load/chaos/game days) – Run load tests to validate scraping under high series volume. – Conduct chaos experiments to verify scrape resilience. – Schedule game days to practice incident playbooks.
9) Continuous improvement – Monitor series growth and cost metrics. – Review alert false positive rates and reduce noise. – Iterate instrumentation and relabeling.
Pre-production checklist:
- All targets register in service discovery.
- TLS and auth verified end-to-end.
- Scrape intervals and timeouts set per job.
- Alerts configured for scrape health.
- Baseline dashboards created.
Production readiness checklist:
- Scalability tested under expected series churn.
- Remediation automation in place.
- Runbooks accessible and validated.
- Storage and retention aligned with budget.
Incident checklist specific to Metric scraping:
- Check scraper logs and self-metrics.
- Confirm service discovery entries for affected targets.
- Validate network policies and firewall logs.
- Verify auth tokens and cert expiration.
- If cardinality spike, identify new labels and apply relabeling.
Use Cases of Metric scraping
1) Application performance monitoring – Context: HTTP services needing latency and error metrics. – Problem: Detecting regressions post-deploy. – Why scraping helps: Continuous sampling captures changes. – What to measure: Request rate, error rate, p95/p99 latency histograms. – Typical tools: Prometheus, language client libs.
2) Kubernetes cluster health – Context: Multi-node K8s clusters. – Problem: Node pressure and container OOMs. – Why scraping helps: Node-exporter and cAdvisor provide host insights. – What to measure: CPU, memory, pod restarts, disk pressure. – Typical tools: Prometheus with kube-state-metrics.
3) Autoscaling decisions – Context: Horizontal autoscaling based on custom metrics. – Problem: Need stable metrics for scale decisions. – Why scraping helps: Centralized, consistent metrics used by controllers. – What to measure: Request queue depth, processing latency, backpressure signals. – Typical tools: Metrics server, custom exporters.
4) Cost monitoring – Context: Cloud spend optimization. – Problem: Unexpected spend due to unbounded metrics. – Why scraping helps: Measure storage and ingest to alert on spikes. – What to measure: Samples/sec, storage bytes per day, series count. – Typical tools: Prometheus, Grafana, billing connectors.
5) Database performance – Context: Managed DB or self-hosted clusters. – Problem: Slow queries and connection saturation. – Why scraping helps: DB exporters expose query time and queue length. – What to measure: Query latency histogram, connection count, slow queries. – Typical tools: DB exporters.
6) Security telemetry – Context: Authentication and policy enforcement. – Problem: High failed login rates or suspicious activity. – Why scraping helps: Aggregated auth metrics enable alerting. – What to measure: Failed login rate, unusual IP counts, policy denial metrics. – Typical tools: Security exporters, SIEM integration.
7) CI/CD pipeline health – Context: Build and deploy pipelines. – Problem: Build flakiness and job duration spikes. – Why scraping helps: Pipeline metrics show reliability trends. – What to measure: Job duration, failure rate, queue wait times. – Typical tools: CI exporters.
8) Edge device monitoring – Context: IoT or remote appliances. – Problem: Intermittent connectivity and telemetry gaps. – Why scraping helps: Local agents buffer and expose aggregated metrics. – What to measure: Uptime, telemetry lag, buffer sizes. – Typical tools: Lightweight agents and scrape proxies.
9) Service-level compliance – Context: SLA reporting to customers. – Problem: Need auditable SLI evidence. – Why scraping helps: Centralized metrics with retention provide proof. – What to measure: Availability, latency, error rates by customer. – Typical tools: Central TSDB and dashboards.
10) Feature experimentation – Context: A/B testing feature performance. – Problem: Measuring feature-specific performance impact. – Why scraping helps: Instrumented metrics per variant expose regressions. – What to measure: Variant latency, conversion rates, failure rates. – Typical tools: Custom instrumentation and Prometheus.
Scenario Examples (Realistic, End-to-End)
Scenario #1 — Kubernetes cluster outage detection
Context: Production K8s cluster with multiple services. Goal: Detect node and pod level failures quickly. Why Metric scraping matters here: Scraped node and pod metrics provide early signals of resource exhaustion and pod failure. Architecture / workflow: Node-exporters on all nodes, kube-state-metrics, Prometheus server scraping via Kubernetes service discovery, alert manager for routing. Step-by-step implementation:
- Deploy node-exporter and kube-state-metrics as DaemonSets.
- Configure Prometheus service discovery with relabeling.
- Define alerts for node disk pressure and pod restarts.
- Create on-call and debug dashboards. What to measure: Node CPU/memory, pod restart rate, kubelet scrape success. Tools to use and why: Prometheus for scraping, Grafana for dashboards, Alertmanager for routing. Common pitfalls: Missing relabel rules cause many series; network policies block scrapes. Validation: Run pod eviction chaos and verify alerts and dashboards update. Outcome: Faster detection of resource exhaustion and reduced incident MTTR.
Scenario #2 — Serverless function cold-start monitoring
Context: Serverless platform with managed functions. Goal: Measure and reduce cold start latency. Why Metric scraping matters here: Scraping managed metrics or using provider adapters gives invocation and cold start counts. Architecture / workflow: Provider exposes metrics to a scraper adapter or collector; remote write to central TSDB. Step-by-step implementation:
- Configure provider adapter to expose function metrics.
- Scrape function metrics at short intervals for high-fidelity.
- Create histograms for cold start durations and counts.
- Alert on increased cold start rate. What to measure: Invocation rate, cold start count, average cold start latency. Tools to use and why: OTEL collector as adapter, Prometheus for storage. Common pitfalls: Provider sampling hides individual cold starts. Validation: Spike concurrent invocations and observe cold start metrics. Outcome: Identified functions needing warmers or memory tuning reducing user impact.
Scenario #3 — Incident response postmortem using scrape gaps
Context: An outage with partial telemetry loss. Goal: Reconstruct timeline and root cause of missing metrics. Why Metric scraping matters here: Scrape logs and up metrics help determine whether collectors or targets failed. Architecture / workflow: Prometheus scrape logs, remote write receipts, alerts logged in incident timeline. Step-by-step implementation:
- Pull Prometheus scrape_success and scrape_duration over incident window.
- Correlate with deployment events and network policy changes.
- Identify first failing scrape and upstream cause.
- Document in postmortem with timeline and remediation. What to measure: scrape_success, scrape_target_status, network ACL changes. Tools to use and why: Queryable TSDB and log sources for correlation. Common pitfalls: Missing retention of scrape logs prevents full RCA. Validation: Replay synthetic scrapes post-fix to ensure visibility. Outcome: Clear root cause and implemented automation to prevent recurrence.
Scenario #4 — Cost versus fidelity trade-off
Context: High-volume telemetry increasing cloud spend. Goal: Reduce storage costs while preserving SLO coverage. Why Metric scraping matters here: Scrape interval and cardinality directly influence costs. Architecture / workflow: Identify high-cardinality metrics, adjust relabeling, and implement downsampling. Step-by-step implementation:
- Measure samples/sec and storage per metric.
- Identify top cost drivers by series.
- Apply relabeling to drop or aggregate user-specific labels.
- Introduce longer retention for SLIs, downsample detailed metrics. What to measure: Storage bytes/day, series churn, SLO impact. Tools to use and why: TSDB cost metrics, custom queries to identify hot series. Common pitfalls: Dropping metrics that affect SLIs. Validation: Monitor SLIs before and after changes and confirm no regression. Outcome: Reduced costs with maintained SLOs and documented trade-offs.
Common Mistakes, Anti-patterns, and Troubleshooting
(List of mistakes: Symptom -> Root cause -> Fix) — at least 15 entries, include observability pitfalls.
- Symptom: Sudden metric drop -> Root cause: Service discovery mismatch -> Fix: Validate SD config and add alerts for missing jobs.
- Symptom: High number of unique series -> Root cause: User ID used as label -> Fix: Remove or hash user ID and aggregate.
- Symptom: Scraper OOM -> Root cause: Too many targets per scraper -> Fix: Horizontal scale scrapers and limit per-scraper targets.
- Symptom: Alerts fire but no incident -> Root cause: Low-quality SLO thresholds -> Fix: Re-evaluate SLOs and adjust thresholds.
- Symptom: Slow queries -> Root cause: High cardinality and expensive label joins -> Fix: Reduce labels and pre-aggregate.
- Symptom: False negatives on SLOs -> Root cause: Missing metric points -> Fix: Monitor missing critical SLI data and alert on gaps.
- Symptom: Parser errors -> Root cause: Metric format change in app -> Fix: Version /metrics endpoints and update exporters.
- Symptom: Scrape timeouts -> Root cause: Large payloads or slow endpoints -> Fix: Increase timeout or reduce payload size.
- Symptom: Unauthorized responses -> Root cause: Expired tokens -> Fix: Centralize token rotation and monitor auth errors.
- Symptom: Cost spike -> Root cause: Increased retention or new high-cardinality metrics -> Fix: Apply retention tiers and relabeling.
- Symptom: Metrics leaked externally -> Root cause: Unsecured /metrics endpoints -> Fix: Enforce TLS and auth and restrict access.
- Symptom: Inconsistent timestamps -> Root cause: Client time skew -> Fix: Sync clocks and prefer collection timestamp if needed.
- Symptom: Duplicate series -> Root cause: Multiple exporters exposing same metrics with different labels -> Fix: Standardize label hygiene and dedupe.
- Symptom: No data after deployment -> Root cause: Exporter not deployed or port mismatch -> Fix: Verify exporter deployment and port mappings.
- Symptom: Alert storm during rollout -> Root cause: Mass label change after deploy -> Fix: Stagger rollout and use maintenance windows.
- Symptom: High scrape latency for a job -> Root cause: Network path congestion -> Fix: Use local agents or scrape proxies.
- Symptom: Missing historical context -> Root cause: Short retention on TSDB -> Fix: Adjust retention and long-term remote write.
- Symptom: Unclear ownership of metrics -> Root cause: No ownership model -> Fix: Assign metric owners in playbooks.
- Symptom: Incomplete postmortem -> Root cause: No retention of scrape logs -> Fix: Retain scrape metadata for RCA.
- Symptom: Observability blindspots -> Root cause: Overreliance on a single telemetry type -> Fix: Combine logs, traces, and metrics for context.
- Symptom: Noisy metrics -> Root cause: High-frequency sampling on low-value metrics -> Fix: Reduce frequency or sample adaptively.
- Symptom: Missing SLIs in dashboards -> Root cause: Wrong query or label mismatch -> Fix: Validate queries against raw series and adjust.
Best Practices & Operating Model
Ownership and on-call:
- Assign metric owners and a central observability team responsible for scrape pipeline.
- Include on-call rotations that cover scraping platform and SLO incidents.
Runbooks vs playbooks:
- Runbooks: Step-by-step remediation for common scrape failures.
- Playbooks: High-level incident coordination templates for severe outages.
Safe deployments:
- Use canary deployment for exporter changes and relabel rules.
- Have rollback triggers tied to metric regressions.
Toil reduction and automation:
- Automate service discovery onboarding from CI/CD.
- Auto-apply standard relabel rules for common frameworks.
- Auto-scale scrapers based on series churn.
Security basics:
- Require TLS and token-based auth for exposed endpoints.
- Limit /metrics access via network policies and RBAC.
- Audit exporter versions and configurations.
Weekly/monthly routines:
- Weekly: Review top series growth and top cost drivers.
- Monthly: Validate SLOs and alert effectiveness.
- Quarterly: Capacity planning and retention review.
What to review in postmortems:
- Timeline of scrape successes and failures.
- Any relabel or instrumentation changes around incident.
- Series growth and whether cardinality contributed.
- Remediation and automation created to prevent recurrence.
Tooling & Integration Map for Metric scraping (TABLE REQUIRED)
| ID | Category | What it does | Key integrations | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| I1 | Scraper | Pulls metrics from targets and exposes self metrics | Kubernetes service discovery and exporters | Central component for pull model |
| I2 | Exporter | Exposes application or system metrics | Scrapers and monitoring backends | Needs label hygiene |
| I3 | Collector | Receives, transforms, and forwards metrics | Remote write and processors | Useful for multi-tenant funnels |
| I4 | TSDB | Stores time series at scale | Query engines and alerting | Retention management required |
| I5 | Dashboard | Visualizes metrics and trends | TSDB and alerting integrations | Role based access recommended |
| I6 | Alerting | Executes rules and routes incidents | Pager, ticketing, and webhook systems | Correlation reduces noise |
| I7 | ServiceDiscovery | Provides dynamic target lists | Cloud APIs and orchestrators | Critical for dynamic environments |
| I8 | Relabeling | Transforms and filters labels | Scrapers and collectors | Must be versioned and tested |
| I9 | Authentication | Secures metrics endpoints | TLS, tokens, and secret managers | Rotations must be automated |
| I10 | RemoteWrite | Forwards metrics to external storage | Managed backends and archival systems | Network and cost implications |
Row Details (only if needed)
- None
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
What is the difference between scraping and pushing metrics?
Scraping is pull-based where collector requests endpoints; pushing is target-initiated. Use scraping for long-lived services, push for ephemeral jobs.
How often should I scrape my services?
Depends on fidelity needs and cost. Typical ranges are 15s to 60s. Critical SLIs may require 5–15s, but cost rises quickly.
Can scraping work across VPCs and firewalled networks?
Yes via scrape proxies, VPNs, or local agents forwarding to central collectors. Network architecture dictates approach.
How do I prevent high cardinality from breaking my TSDB?
Enforce label policies, relabel unwanted tags out, aggregate or sample high-cardinality dimensions before ingest.
Should I scrape serverless functions directly?
Managed serverless often provides metrics via provider APIs; use adapters or remote write. Direct scraping may not be supported.
What is relabeling and why is it important?
Relabeling modifies labels at scrape or ingestion time to normalize, drop, or rename tags. It prevents label explosion and standardizes queries.
How do I secure /metrics endpoints?
Use TLS, token-based auth, network policies, and restrict exposure to only scrapers. Audit endpoints regularly.
What are common scrape failure indicators?
High scrape failure rate, increasing scrape latency, missing up metric, parser errors.
How do I measure the cost impact of scraping?
Monitor samples/sec, bytes stored per day, series count, and project cost against retention and query rates.
Is Prometheus the only option for scraping?
No. There are collectors, managed services, and agents that perform scraping or receive remote write. Choice depends on scale and operational model.
How to handle ephemeral jobs in scraping model?
Use push gateways or have jobs push to a local agent that is scraped by central collectors.
What retention policy should I use?
Business needs determine retention. Keep high-fidelity SLI data longer and downsample detailed metrics for historical analysis.
How often should I audit metrics and labels?
At least monthly for high-change environments; weekly for high-growth or cost-sensitive systems.
Can scraping be a single point of failure?
Yes if scrapers are not scaled or redundant. Use multiple collectors and remote write to mitigate.
How do I test scrape configurations before production?
Use pre-production clusters, synthetic exporters, and dry run relabel tests; run game days and load tests.
What is series churn and why care?
Series churn is the rate of new unique series creation; high churn indicates potential cardinality issues and cost spikes.
How do I reduce alert noise from metrics?
Tune SLOs, use grouping and dedupe, suppress during deploys, and maintain alert ownership.
Conclusion
Metric scraping remains a foundational observability pattern in cloud-native SRE practice. It enables accurate SLIs, drives alerting, and supports automation like autoscaling and cost control when implemented with care for cardinality, security, and scalability.
Next 7 days plan:
- Day 1: Inventory all /metrics endpoints and service discovery sources.
- Day 2: Add scrape success and latency dashboards and basic alerts.
- Day 3: Audit labels for cardinality risks and implement relabel rules.
- Day 4: Define SLIs for two critical services and set SLOs.
- Day 5: Run a short load test to validate scraper capacity.
Appendix — Metric scraping Keyword Cluster (SEO)
- Primary keywords
- metric scraping
- metrics scraping
- scrape metrics
- prometheus scraping
-
scrape architecture
-
Secondary keywords
- scrape interval best practice
- scrape timeout configuration
- relabeling metrics
- exporter for metrics
-
scrape failure troubleshooting
-
Long-tail questions
- how to configure prometheus scrape jobs
- what is metric scraping in observability
- how to reduce metric cardinality in scraping
- best practices for scrape intervals and retention
- how to secure metrics endpoints for scraping
- how to handle ephemeral metrics with scraping
- scrape proxy for cross network scraping
- how to measure scrape success rate
- how to design SLIs from scraped metrics
- how to downsample scraped metrics cost effectively
- how to instrument apps for scraping
- what causes scrape timeouts and how to fix them
- how to detect high-cardinality metrics from scraping
- how to set up service discovery for scraping
- how to remote write scraped metrics to managed storage
- how to aggregate metrics before scraping
- how to use OpenTelemetry for scraping
- how to create dashboards for scrape health
- how to automate relabel rules for scraping
-
how to test scrape configs in staging
-
Related terminology
- exporter
- pushgateway
- remote write
- TSDB
- series churn
- scrape latency
- scrape success rate
- relabel_config
- service discovery
- histogram buckets
- gauge vs counter
- monotonic counter
- scrape proxy
- node exporter
- kube-state-metrics
- OpenMetrics format
- collector pipeline
- cardinality
- retention policy
- downsampling
- error budget
- SLI SLO
- alert burn rate
- scrape timeout
- scrape interval
- authentication token
- TLS for metrics
- exporter security
- metric naming convention
- label hygiene
- push vs pull model
- sidecar exporter
- local agent
- remote storage
- cost per sample
- observability pipeline
- query performance
- histogram quantiles
- instrumentation library
- scrape scheduler
- scraper autoscaling
- scrape diagnostics
- scrape payload size