Quick Definition (30–60 words)
Elastic Load Balancing (ELB) is a managed service that distributes incoming network traffic across multiple backend targets to improve availability, scalability, and fault tolerance. Analogy: ELB is the traffic cop at a busy intersection directing cars to open lanes. Formal: ELB is a horizontally scalable, front-end proxy and health-aware router with built-in TLS and policy controls.
What is Elastic Load Balancing ELB?
What it is / what it is NOT
- What it is: A load-distribution layer that routes client requests to healthy backend targets while handling TLS termination, health checks, and some routing policies.
- What it is NOT: It is not a full-service API gateway, not a complete WAF, and not a replacement for application-level retries, circuit breakers, or per-request authorization logic.
Key properties and constraints
- Handles connection and request distribution across pools of targets.
- Supports health checks to exclude unhealthy targets.
- Often provides TLS termination, sticky sessions, and routing rules.
- Can be regional or global depending on provider.
- Has limits: connection rates, target registration rate, configuration propagation delay vary by implementation.
- Billing is usage-based (connections, hours, data transferred) — exact pricing model: Varied / depends.
Where it fits in modern cloud/SRE workflows
- Ingress control for public-facing services.
- Front door for microservices when combined with service meshes.
- Termination point for TLS offload and certificate management.
- Integrates with autoscaling to add/remove capacity.
- A key component in incident response and SRE ownership for availability SLIs.
A text-only “diagram description” readers can visualize
- Internet clients -> Edge DNS -> ELB front-end tier -> Listener rules -> Target groups -> Compute backends (VMs/containers/serverless) -> Observability & autoscaling -> Health checks and failover.
Elastic Load Balancing ELB in one sentence
A managed, health-aware traffic router that distributes client requests across multiple backend targets to improve availability, scalability, and resilience.
Elastic Load Balancing ELB vs related terms (TABLE REQUIRED)
ID | Term | How it differs from Elastic Load Balancing ELB | Common confusion | T1 | Reverse Proxy | Focused on request/response manipulation at app level | Confused with ELB when proxy has load features | T2 | API Gateway | Provides API management, auth, rate limits | People expect ELB to handle API auth | T3 | CDN | Caches static content at edge nodes | Thought to reduce need for ELB for performance | T4 | Service Mesh | Sidecar networking for east-west traffic | Confused for replacing ELB at north-south edge | T5 | DNS Load Balancer | Uses DNS to distribute traffic | Assumed to be equivalent to ELB for health checks | T6 | Layer 4 Load Balancer | Operates at transport layer only | Mistaken as having advanced routing rules | T7 | Layer 7 Load Balancer | Inspects HTTP and routes by content | Sometimes used interchangeably with ELB | T8 | WAF | Focused on security rules and blocking | Expected to provide routing and scaling | T9 | NAT Gateway | Handles outbound IP translation | Mistaken as inbound load distribution | T10 | Global Load Balancer | Routes across regions | Assumed to be same as regional ELB
Row Details (only if any cell says “See details below”)
- None
Why does Elastic Load Balancing ELB matter?
Business impact (revenue, trust, risk)
- Availability drives revenue and trust; a single misrouted request can translate to lost sales.
- Properly configured ELB improves mean time to recovery by routing around failures, protecting SLAs.
- Misconfiguration or capacity misestimation can cause broad outages and reputational damage.
Engineering impact (incident reduction, velocity)
- Centralized TLS and routing reduces repetitive work in app teams.
- Health checks and routing rules reduce blast radius for failures.
- Proper automation integration with autoscaling speeds delivery and reduces incident toil.
SRE framing (SLIs/SLOs/error budgets/toil/on-call)
- ELB is a core dependency; its SLIs (availability, latency, error rate) should be part of the service SLO.
- SRE teams should manage error budgets including ELB-induced errors.
- Toil: manual target registration, certificate rotation, and ad-hoc rule changes can create toil; automate them.
3–5 realistic “what breaks in production” examples
- Health check flaps cause all traffic to drain from a target group, leaving insufficient capacity.
- Misapplied SSL policy causes client TLS negotiation failures for a subset of users.
- Route rule overlap sends traffic to a wrong target group after a deployment.
- DNS TTL too long causes traffic to keep going to a failed regional ELB during failover.
- Unexpected surge overwhelms connection limits causing 5xx errors.
Where is Elastic Load Balancing ELB used? (TABLE REQUIRED)
ID | Layer/Area | How Elastic Load Balancing ELB appears | Typical telemetry | Common tools | L1 | Edge Network | Public listeners and TLS termination | Connection rate TLS handshakes client IP | Load test tools Observability stack | L2 | Service / Application | HTTP routing to backend services | Request latency HTTP codes backend health | Ingress controllers Service mesh | L3 | Kubernetes | Ingress or Service of type LoadBalancer | Endpoint readiness request errors | K8s controllers Metrics server | L4 | Serverless | Fronting functions or managed APIs | Invocation latency cold starts errors | Serverless dashboards Tracing | L5 | CI/CD | Blue/green or canary routing | Deployment rollout success traffic split | CI pipelines Feature flags | L6 | Security / WAF | Associated policy enforcement at edge | Blocked requests rule matches | WAF logs IDS systems | L7 | Observability | Source for traffic telemetry | Request traces error percentages | APM, SIEM, Logs | L8 | Cost Management | Billing by data and hours | Data transferred per hour listener hours | Cost dashboards Cloud billing tools
Row Details (only if needed)
- L1: Edge Network details — Use for global ingress control, manage certs centrally, watch TLS metrics.
- L3: Kubernetes details — Controller exposes service IPs, requires cloud provider integration.
- L4: Serverless details — ELB may be virtual; observe cold-starts and concurrency patterns.
When should you use Elastic Load Balancing ELB?
When it’s necessary
- You have multiple backend endpoints that must receive traffic reliably.
- You need centralized TLS termination and certificate management.
- Health-aware routing is required to prevent sending traffic to failed instances.
- Autoscaling backends where target registration is automated.
When it’s optional
- Single-instance internal tools with low traffic and no redundancy requirements.
- Simple static content that a CDN can serve more cost-effectively.
When NOT to use / overuse it
- Avoid using ELB to implement complex application routing or authorization logic that belongs in the app layer or API gateway.
- Don’t chain multiple ELBs in series without clear reasons; it adds latency and complexity.
- Avoid using ELB for internal east-west microservice traffic if a service mesh provides better observability and retries.
Decision checklist
- If you need health-aware inbound routing and TLS offload -> Use ELB.
- If you require API-level auth, rate limiting, and transformation -> Consider API Gateway in front of ELB or instead.
- If you operate in Kubernetes and want cloud-managed external access -> Use ELB via ingress controller.
- If primary goal is caching static assets -> Use CDN instead of ELB.
Maturity ladder: Beginner -> Intermediate -> Advanced
- Beginner: Single ELB per service with default health checks and TLS.
- Intermediate: Use target groups, path-based routing, autoscaling integration, and blue/green deployment support.
- Advanced: Global load balancing with weighted traffic shifts, traffic shaping, automated certificate lifecycle, and observability-driven autoscaling policies.
How does Elastic Load Balancing ELB work?
Components and workflow
- Listeners: Accept incoming connections on ports and protocols.
- Rules: Match incoming requests and choose target groups.
- Target groups: Logical sets of backend targets with health checks.
- Backends/targets: Servers, containers, or functions that handle requests.
- Health checks: Periodic probes that determine target health.
- Metrics and logs: Telemetry emitted for monitoring.
- Autoscaling hooks: Add or remove compute based on metrics.
Data flow and lifecycle
- Client connects to ELB public endpoint.
- Listener accepts connection and evaluates rules.
- Request is forwarded to a healthy target based on balancing algorithm.
- Backend responds; ELB forwards response to client.
- Health checks continuously ensure target group integrity.
- Autoscaler or human action updates target group membership as needed.
Edge cases and failure modes
- Slow start or ramp-up delays after target registration lead to backend overload.
- Half-open TCP connections cause stuck connections if not timed out properly.
- Gradual CPU saturation on backends increases tail latency and 5xx errors.
- Incorrect health check path or timeout marks healthy instances as unhealthy.
Typical architecture patterns for Elastic Load Balancing ELB
- Single regional ELB fronting web fleet: Simple public endpoint for a set of VMs/containers.
- ELB + API Gateway: ELB handles TLS and distribution; API Gateway manages auth and rate limits.
- ELB in front of Kubernetes ingress controller: Cloud ELB forwards to cluster ingress nodes.
- Blue/green with weighted ELB target groups: Two target groups used to shift traffic during deploy.
- Edge ELB + CDN: ELB provides dynamic content routing; CDN caches static assets.
- Global ELB + regional failover: Global routing sends traffic to healthy regional ELBs.
Failure modes & mitigation (TABLE REQUIRED)
ID | Failure mode | Symptom | Likely cause | Mitigation | Observability signal | F1 | Health check flapping | Targets repeatedly drain and register | Wrong path or aggressive timeout | Tune health checks add grace period | Spike in unregister events | F2 | TLS handshake failures | Clients get TLS errors | Certificate mismatch or expired cert | Rotate certs automate renewal | Increase in TLS alert logs | F3 | Connection saturation | 5xx or refused connections | ELB hit connection limits | Scale ELB or use multiple listeners | High active connections metric | F4 | Misrouted traffic | Users reach wrong service | Overlapping rules or wrong priority | Review rules and test in staging | Increase in unexpected 4xx/5xx | F5 | Slow backend responses | Increased latency and timeouts | Backend overload or GC pauses | Autoscale or optimize backend | Tail latency metric rise | F6 | Config propagation delay | New rules not applying quickly | Management API delay | Use controlled rollout and validation | Configuration change age | F7 | Uneven load distribution | Some targets overloaded others idle | Sticky sessions or algorithm mismatch | Reconfigure stickiness or algorithm | Per-target request rate skew | F8 | DNS TTL issues | Requests stuck to failed region | DNS TTL too long on failover | Reduce TTL or use health-aware DNS | Regional traffic shift lag
Row Details (only if needed)
- None
Key Concepts, Keywords & Terminology for Elastic Load Balancing ELB
Below are 40+ terms, each with a concise definition, why it matters, and a common pitfall.
- Listener — Component that accepts connections on protocol and port — It is the entrypoint — Pitfall: wrong port configuration.
- Target group — A set of backend endpoints — Groups backends by routing policy — Pitfall: mismatched health checks.
- Health check — Probe to determine backend health — Prevents traffic to unhealthy targets — Pitfall: aggressive thresholds.
- Sticky session — Session affinity to same backend — Useful for session stateful apps — Pitfall: uneven load distribution.
- TLS termination — Offloading TLS at the ELB — Simplifies cert management — Pitfall: forgetting end-to-end encryption.
- Backend protocol — Protocol used to talk to backends — Ensures compatibility — Pitfall: mismatch with client expectations.
- Round-robin — Simple balancing algorithm — Easy distribution — Pitfall: ignores backend capacity differences.
- Least-connections — Balancing by active connections — Better for variable request durations — Pitfall: tracking overhead.
- Health check timeout — How long to wait for probe response — Impacts detection speed — Pitfall: too short causes false positives.
- Draining / connection draining — Graceful removal of targets — Allows in-flight requests to finish — Pitfall: draining too short causes errors.
- Cross-zone load balancing — Distributes traffic across zones — Improves resilience — Pitfall: additional data transfer costs.
- Idle timeout — Connection inactivity timeout — Prevents stale connections — Pitfall: kills long-polling without extension.
- Backend re-registration — Adding targets back to group — Used during autoscaling — Pitfall: race conditions at scale.
- Access logs — Logs for requests passing through ELB — Critical for forensics — Pitfall: high storage and cost if not sampled.
- Metrics emission — Telemetry from ELB — Foundation for alerts — Pitfall: sampling hides tail events.
- 4xx and 5xx errors — Client and server error classes — Key SLI components — Pitfall: misattributed errors from infrastructure.
- Connection reset — Abrupt closure of connection — Indicates issues — Pitfall: misdiagnosed as app bug.
- Certificate rotation — Updating TLS certs — Maintains secure connections — Pitfall: expired certs cause outages.
- SNI — Server Name Indication for TLS — Allows multiple certs on one IP — Pitfall: older clients may not support SNI.
- Weighted routing — Distributes percentage of traffic — Useful for canary deploys — Pitfall: wrong weights cause traffic leaks.
- Path-based routing — Routes by request path — Supports multiple apps on same domain — Pitfall: conflicting rules.
- Host-based routing — Routes by hostname — Enables virtual hosting — Pitfall: wildcard mismatches.
- Global load balancing — Routes across regions — Improves geo resilience — Pitfall: complexity and data residency.
- DNS failover — Switch based on health checks — Adds resilience — Pitfall: DNS TTL delays.
- Autoscaling integration — ELB triggers scaling or vice versa — Enables dynamic capacity — Pitfall: feedback loops if misconfigured.
- Circuit breaker — Application-level protection — Prevents cascading failures — Pitfall: expected at ELB level but absent.
- Rate limiting — Controls request rates — Protects backends — Pitfall: not native in many ELBs.
- WAF integration — Adds security rules at edge — Shields apps — Pitfall: false positives block real users.
- Latency p99/p95 — Tail latency metrics — Indicates worst-case performance — Pitfall: averaging hides tails.
- Canary deployment — Gradual traffic shifting — Lowers deployment risk — Pitfall: insufficient testing leads to user impact.
- Blue/green deployment — Switch between two environments — Fast rollback — Pitfall: data migration complexity.
- Observability context propagation — Tracing headers through ELB — Enables end-to-end traces — Pitfall: header stripping by misconfig.
- Sticky cookie — Cookie-based affinity mechanism — Common for web apps — Pitfall: cookie steal risk.
- Target registration rate — Speed of adding targets — Important at scale — Pitfall: throttling by control plane.
- Connection multiplexing — Reusing backend connections — Reduces overhead — Pitfall: head-of-line blocking.
- Warm pools — Pre-initialized instances for scale-up — Reduces cold-start impact — Pitfall: cost overhead.
- Grace period — Time to allow backend warmup — Prevents premature health marking — Pitfall: omitted during autoscale.
- Service discovery integration — Dynamic backend resolution — Essential for microservices — Pitfall: stale entries.
- Infrastructure as Code — Declarative ELB configurations — Improves reproducibility — Pitfall: drift from manual changes.
- Edge DDoS protection — Layered defense often provided with ELB — Protects availability — Pitfall: over-reliance without internal mitigation.
How to Measure Elastic Load Balancing ELB (Metrics, SLIs, SLOs) (TABLE REQUIRED)
ID | Metric/SLI | What it tells you | How to measure | Starting target | Gotchas | M1 | Request success rate | Availability of service from client POV | Successful responses divided by total requests | 99.9% for external web APIs | Include client-side errors | M2 | Request latency p95 | User-facing latency | 95th percentile of request durations | < 500 ms for APIs | Tail latency may vary by endpoint | M3 | Error rate 5xx | Server-side failures | 5xx responses / total requests | < 0.1% for critical APIs | Distinguish ELB vs backend 5xx | M4 | Healthy host count | Capacity and redundancy | Number of targets healthy per AZ | >=2 per AZ or as needed | Health check flaps affect this | M5 | Active connections | Load on ELB | Count of open connections | Keep under documented limits | High idle connections can inflate | M6 | TLS handshake success | TLS negotiation health | Successful handshakes / attempts | 99.99% TLS success | Older clients may fail | M7 | TLS renegotiation rate | TLS overhead metric | Number of renegotiations per min | Low or zero | High rate indicates client issues | M8 | Request per target | Load distribution | Requests divided by healthy targets | Even distribution expected | Sticky sessions skew this | M9 | Backend response time | Backend contribution to latency | Backend processing time metric | p95 < 200 ms internal | Instrumentation required | M10 | Config change error rate | Stability of control plane changes | Errors after config changes | Target zero impactful changes | Rollbacks may be needed | M11 | Connection errors | Networking failures | Connection failures per minute | Near zero | Bursty networks can spike | M12 | Draining completion time | Graceful termination progress | Time to finish open requests | < configured draining period | Long requests delay completion | M13 | Rule evaluation latency | Addl ELB processing cost | Time to evaluate listener rules | Small ms range | Complex rules increase latency | M14 | Traffic split adherence | Canary/weight accuracy | Observed vs configured weight | Within 1% for large traffic | Small sample sizes distort | M15 | Data transfer out | Cost and capacity | Bytes transferred from ELB | Varies by traffic | High egress costs if unmonitored
Row Details (only if needed)
- None
Best tools to measure Elastic Load Balancing ELB
Tool — Prometheus + Grafana
- What it measures for Elastic Load Balancing ELB: Metrics scraped from ELB exporter and backend services.
- Best-fit environment: Kubernetes and VM fleets using open-source stacks.
- Setup outline:
- Deploy exporter or collect cloud provider metrics via exporter.
- Configure Prometheus scrape jobs and recording rules.
- Build Grafana dashboards.
- Add alerts with Alertmanager.
- Strengths:
- Highly customizable and open.
- Good for long-term recording and alerting.
- Limitations:
- Requires operational overhead and scaling.
- Not always trivial to collect managed-service metrics.
Tool — Cloud provider native monitoring
- What it measures for Elastic Load Balancing ELB: Provider-specific ELB metrics, logs, and alarms.
- Best-fit environment: Fully managed cloud-native workloads.
- Setup outline:
- Enable ELB metrics and access logs.
- Create dashboards and alarms in cloud console.
- Integrate with alerting targets.
- Strengths:
- Native integration and minimal setup.
- Accurate provider-specific metrics.
- Limitations:
- Varies by provider and visibility; may require additional instrumentation.
Tool — Datadog
- What it measures for Elastic Load Balancing ELB: Aggregated ELB metrics, traces, and logs with out-of-box dashboards.
- Best-fit environment: Multi-cloud and hybrid environments.
- Setup outline:
- Enable ELB integration.
- Forward logs and traces.
- Use built-in monitors and dashboards.
- Strengths:
- Unified metrics, traces, logs.
- Quick to set up with ready-made dashboards.
- Limitations:
- Commercial cost and sampling configurations.
Tool — New Relic
- What it measures for Elastic Load Balancing ELB: ELB telemetry and request traces correlated to backends.
- Best-fit environment: Enterprises using New Relic APM.
- Setup outline:
- Connect cloud account.
- Enable ELB metrics and logs ingestion.
- Customize dashboards and alerts.
- Strengths:
- Deep tracing and correlational views.
- Limitations:
- Cost and vendor lock-in considerations.
Tool — OpenTelemetry + Backends
- What it measures for Elastic Load Balancing ELB: Traces and context propagation through ELB where supported.
- Best-fit environment: Distributed systems needing context propagation.
- Setup outline:
- Instrument services with OpenTelemetry.
- Ensure tracing headers are preserved by ELB.
- Export to chosen backend.
- Strengths:
- Standardized tracing across stack.
- Limitations:
- ELB may not propagate all headers by default; check settings.
Recommended dashboards & alerts for Elastic Load Balancing ELB
Executive dashboard
- Panels:
- Overall request success rate: shows availability trend.
- Total traffic in/out: cost and load overview.
- High-level latency p95: user impact indicator.
- Active healthy targets count: capacity health.
- Why: Provides leaders quick view of revenue-impacting availability.
On-call dashboard
- Panels:
- Current 5xx rate and recent spike timeline.
- Per-target error rates and latency.
- Health check failures and target draining events.
- Active connections and TLS handshake errors.
- Why: Focuses on signals SREs need for fast triage.
Debug dashboard
- Panels:
- Request traces for failing requests.
- Listener rule evaluation logs.
- Per-AZ target distribution and CPU/memory of backends.
- Access log samples with request/response codes.
- Why: Enables root-cause and performance troubleshooting.
Alerting guidance
- What should page vs ticket:
- Page for high-priority incidents: total availability below SLO, sudden large 5xx spike, TLS outage.
- Ticket for non-urgent degradations: long-term trend increases, cost surprises.
- Burn-rate guidance:
- If error budget burn rate > 5x over rolling 1 hour, page escalation.
- Noise reduction tactics:
- Group related alerts, deduplicate based on correlation keys, suppress during planned deployments, use multi-condition alerts (e.g., 5xx count + request rate drop).
Implementation Guide (Step-by-step)
1) Prerequisites – Inventory of services and domains. – Certificate and key management in place. – Observability stack ready for ELB metrics and logs. – IaC templates to manage ELB resources.
2) Instrumentation plan – Enable ELB access logs and forward to logging system. – Export ELB metrics to monitoring and set baseline dashboards. – Ensure application traces propagate through ELB.
3) Data collection – Collect metrics at 10–60s granularity. – Sample and retain access logs for 30–90 days depending on compliance. – Aggregate per-target and per-listener metrics.
4) SLO design – Define primary SLI (request success rate) and latency SLOs. – Allocate error budgets across ELB and backend responsibilities. – Document attribution rules in SLO policy.
5) Dashboards – Build executive, on-call, debug dashboards as above. – Include templating for service and region.
6) Alerts & routing – Define alerts for SLO breaches, health check flaps, and TLS failures. – Route to appropriate on-call teams with playbooks.
7) Runbooks & automation – Create runbooks for common failures: failed cert rotation, health check misconfiguration, capacity limits. – Automate certificate rotation, target registration, and canary rollouts.
8) Validation (load/chaos/game days) – Run load tests to validate scaling and connection limits. – Conduct chaos tests by simulating target and AZ failures. – Game days involving on-call to exercise runbooks.
9) Continuous improvement – Postmortem changes, refine health checks, tune autoscaling. – Automate repeated manual fixes into code.
Checklists
Pre-production checklist
- TLS certificates uploaded and validated.
- Health check paths and thresholds tested.
- Autoscaling policies attached and tested.
- Observability hooks configured.
- IaC templates verified and peer-reviewed.
Production readiness checklist
- SLOs defined and alert thresholds set.
- Runbooks and playbooks accessible to on-call.
- Failover and rollback verified in staging.
- Cost monitoring for ELB egress and hours enabled.
Incident checklist specific to Elastic Load Balancing ELB
- Verify ELB health metrics and rule changes.
- Check recent certificate changes and rotation logs.
- Confirm backend target health and registration events.
- Validate DNS and TTL values for failover.
- If traffic misrouted, rollback recent listener/rule changes.
Use Cases of Elastic Load Balancing ELB
1) Public web application – Context: Multi-AZ web app serving global users. – Problem: Need availability and TLS management. – Why ELB helps: Central TLS termination and health routing. – What to measure: Request success rate, TLS failures, latency. – Typical tools: Cloud metrics, CDN for static content.
2) API microservices – Context: Several stateless microservices behind single domain. – Problem: Route requests by path and maintain availability. – Why ELB helps: Path-based routing and target groups. – What to measure: Per-path latency and error rates. – Typical tools: Tracing and API monitoring.
3) Kubernetes ingress – Context: K8s cluster requiring external access. – Problem: Expose services securely and scale with cluster. – Why ELB helps: Integrates as cloud provider LoadBalancer service. – What to measure: Ingress error rate and per-service traffic. – Typical tools: Prometheus, kube-state-metrics.
4) Blue/green deployment – Context: Risky release with database compatibility concerns. – Problem: Need fast rollback capability. – Why ELB helps: Weighted target groups for traffic shift. – What to measure: Traffic split adherence and error delta. – Typical tools: CI/CD pipeline and metrics.
5) Serverless fronting – Context: Function APIs exposed publicly. – Problem: Protect functions from sudden spikes. – Why ELB helps: TLS and basic rate shaping; front of managed APIs. – What to measure: Invocation latency and concurrency. – Typical tools: Serverless observability and throttles.
6) Global failover – Context: Multi-region deployments for resilience. – Problem: Route users to nearest healthy region. – Why ELB helps: Part of global routing stack to detect region health. – What to measure: Regional availability and DNS failover time. – Typical tools: Global DNS, region health monitors.
7) Internal TCP proxying – Context: Streaming or database proxying. – Problem: Need transport-level balancing without HTTP parsing. – Why ELB helps: Layer 4 balancing with minimal overhead. – What to measure: Active connections and error rates. – Typical tools: Network metrics and tracing.
8) Compliance endpoint – Context: Regulated environment requiring audit logs. – Problem: Need request logs and TLS proof. – Why ELB helps: Access logs provide request-level audit trail. – What to measure: Access log completeness and retention. – Typical tools: SIEM and log archives.
Scenario Examples (Realistic, End-to-End)
Scenario #1 — Kubernetes: Multi-tenant ingress for web services
Context: A team manages multiple web services in a single Kubernetes cluster serving different hostnames.
Goal: Provide secure, path/host-based routing with high availability and observability.
Why Elastic Load Balancing ELB matters here: Cloud ELB exposes cluster to internet, provides TLS, and integrates with ingress controller for dynamic routing.
Architecture / workflow: Internet -> ELB listener -> Ingress controller nodes -> Service endpoints -> Pods.
Step-by-step implementation:
- Create ELB via cloud provider integration for Service type LoadBalancer.
- Configure TLS certificates on ELB and enable SNI.
- Deploy ingress controller and annotate services for path/host rules.
- Set health checks matching pod readiness probes.
- Integrate metrics and logging to central stack.
What to measure: Per-host latency, per-service error rate, healthy pod count.
Tools to use and why: Prometheus for metrics, Grafana for dashboards, kube-state-metrics for pod health.
Common pitfalls: ELB health check path mismatches readiness probes; rule priority conflicts.
Validation: Run canary host routing and simulate pod terminations.
Outcome: Secure multi-tenant ingress with automated scaling and monitoring.
Scenario #2 — Serverless/managed-PaaS: Fronting managed APIs
Context: Using managed FaaS endpoints for microservices and exposing public APIs.
Goal: Centralize TLS management and protect backends from spikes.
Why Elastic Load Balancing ELB matters here: ELB provides stable front door enabling certificate management and initial request routing.
Architecture / workflow: Clients -> ELB -> API Gateway or direct function attachments -> Functions.
Step-by-step implementation:
- Configure ELB listener and map domain to ELB.
- Attach backend targets or API endpoints.
- Configure health checks or integration-level throttles.
- Monitor concurrency and set autoscale where applicable.
What to measure: Invocation successes, function cold starts, ELB error rates.
Tools to use and why: Provider function metrics dashboards and access logs for audit.
Common pitfalls: Cold starts correlation with ELB draining; missing end-to-end encryption.
Validation: Load test with spike traffic and monitor throttling.
Outcome: Managed functions served securely with predictable TLS and routing.
Scenario #3 — Incident-response/postmortem: TLS certificate expiry outage
Context: Production outage where TLS cert expired, causing large drop in traffic.
Goal: Restore TLS and mitigate customer impact quickly.
Why Elastic Load Balancing ELB matters here: ELB was terminating TLS so expired cert blocked clients at edge.
Architecture / workflow: ELB TLS termination -> backends.
Step-by-step implementation:
- Identify TLS handshake error spike via monitoring.
- Verify certificate expiration in ELB cert store.
- Replace certificate and rotate on ELB.
- Validate via synthetic checks and user traffic monitoring.
- Document postmortem and automate future rotations.
What to measure: TLS handshake success, request success rate.
Tools to use and why: Access logs to identify affected users and certificate inventory tools.
Common pitfalls: Manual cert rotation with missing automation; failure to update alternate ELBs.
Validation: Run synthetic TLS checks and staged rollout.
Outcome: Restored secure connections and improved automation for cert lifecycle.
Scenario #4 — Cost/performance trade-off: Egress-heavy media service
Context: Streaming or file delivery service with high data egress and occasional spikes.
Goal: Balance cost and performance while maintaining availability.
Why Elastic Load Balancing ELB matters here: ELB costs include data transfer; architecture choices affect egress and caching.
Architecture / workflow: Clients -> CDN edge -> ELB for dynamic assets -> storage backends.
Step-by-step implementation:
- Move cacheable assets to CDN to reduce ELB egress.
- Configure ELB for dynamic requests; enable compression.
- Monitor data transfer metrics and adjust caching TTLs.
- Use signed URLs to protect content and reduce origin hits.
What to measure: Data transfer out, cache hit ratio, ELB request volume.
Tools to use and why: Cost dashboards and CDN analytics.
Common pitfalls: Over-reliance on ELB for static delivery increasing costs.
Validation: Compare pre/post CDN egress reduction in load tests.
Outcome: Lowered egress costs with similar or better performance.
Common Mistakes, Anti-patterns, and Troubleshooting
List of mistakes with Symptom -> Root cause -> Fix (15–25 entries)
- Symptom: Repeated health check failures -> Root cause: Wrong health check path -> Fix: Align health check with readiness probe.
- Symptom: Sudden TLS errors -> Root cause: Expired cert -> Fix: Rotate certs and automate renewal.
- Symptom: High 5xx from ELB -> Root cause: Backend overload -> Fix: Autoscale or improve backend performance.
- Symptom: Slow p99 latency -> Root cause: Uneven load distribution -> Fix: Disable sticky sessions or tune algorithm.
- Symptom: Connection resets -> Root cause: Idle timeout too low or keepalive mismatch -> Fix: Adjust idle settings end-to-end.
- Symptom: Misrouted requests after deploy -> Root cause: Rule priority collision -> Fix: Validate listener rules in staging.
- Symptom: Inflated cost due to data transfer -> Root cause: Serving static assets via ELB -> Fix: Use CDN and cache TTLs.
- Symptom: Incomplete traces -> Root cause: ELB stripped tracing headers -> Fix: Configure ELB to preserve headers.
- Symptom: Large number of draining events -> Root cause: Frequent scale down or short draining time -> Fix: Increase draining window and use warm pools.
- Symptom: Alerts flood during deploy -> Root cause: Alert thresholds tied to raw rate without suppression -> Fix: Suppress alerts during planned deployments.
- Symptom: Sticky session hot spots -> Root cause: Cookie affinity leading to uneven load -> Fix: Use stateless session storage or distributed cache.
- Symptom: Slow config propagation -> Root cause: Control plane rate limits -> Fix: Stagger updates and use blue/green changes.
- Symptom: Backend servers marked unhealthy sporadically -> Root cause: Short health check intervals and transient latency -> Fix: Increase thresholds and add grace period.
- Symptom: DNS failover slow -> Root cause: High TTL on DNS records -> Fix: Lower TTL and use active health checks.
- Symptom: WAF blocks legit users -> Root cause: Overly broad rules -> Fix: Tune rules and whitelist verified clients.
- Symptom: Missing logs for forensics -> Root cause: Access logging disabled -> Fix: Enable and centralize logs with retention policy.
- Symptom: Elevated connection counts during spikes -> Root cause: Lack of connection multiplexing -> Fix: Use pooling or scale ELB capacity.
- Symptom: Canary traffic not matching weights -> Root cause: Sampling artifacts or small traffic volumes -> Fix: Increase canary duration and monitor traffic split adherence.
- Symptom: Backend CPU spikes after adding targets -> Root cause: Slow start not respected -> Fix: Add warm-up and readiness gating.
- Symptom: Secret leaks via logs -> Root cause: Sensitive data logged in access logs -> Fix: Mask or scrub sensitive fields at ingestion.
- Symptom: Observability blind spots -> Root cause: Not collecting ELB metrics or traces -> Fix: Enable provider metrics and integrate tracing.
- Symptom: Page storms for minor blips -> Root cause: Single-condition noisy alerts -> Fix: Use composite alerts and rate windows.
- Symptom: Overcomplicated rule sets -> Root cause: Accumulated ad-hoc rules -> Fix: Refactor rules and use IaC to manage complexity.
Observability pitfalls (at least 5 included above)
- Missing latency percentiles, lack of end-to-end tracing, disabled access logs, insufficient retention, misconfigured header propagation.
Best Practices & Operating Model
Ownership and on-call
- Ownership: ELB should be owned by platform or infra team with clear runbook handover to app teams.
- On-call: Platform on-call handles ELB availability, app teams handle application-level fixes.
Runbooks vs playbooks
- Runbooks: Step-by-step technical remediation for ELB incidents (cert rotation, health-check tuning).
- Playbooks: Higher-level coordination steps (notifying stakeholders, failover to backup region).
Safe deployments (canary/rollback)
- Use weighted target groups for canary traffic.
- Monitor error delta and latency to decide rollback.
- Automate rollback triggers based on SLO violations.
Toil reduction and automation
- Automate certificate lifecycle.
- Use IaC to manage ELB configuration and prevent drift.
- Integrate autoscaling and health-aware registration.
Security basics
- Enforce TLS minimum versions and strong ciphers.
- Integrate WAF for OWASP protections.
- Limit management-plane access with IAM and audit changes.
Weekly/monthly routines
- Weekly: Review top 5th-percentile latency services and health-check failures.
- Monthly: Rotate certificates if not automated; review rule set for unused entries.
- Quarterly: Run chaos exercises and validate failover scenarios.
What to review in postmortems related to Elastic Load Balancing ELB
- Timeline of ELB metrics and config changes.
- Health check and target group events.
- Access logs and TLS negotiation failures.
- Actions taken and automation gaps.
Tooling & Integration Map for Elastic Load Balancing ELB (TABLE REQUIRED)
ID | Category | What it does | Key integrations | Notes | I1 | Monitoring | Collects ELB metrics and alerts | Metrics backend logs tracing | Use for SLIs and SLOs | I2 | Logging | Stores ELB access logs | SIEM object storage analytics | Essential for forensics | I3 | Tracing | End-to-end request tracing | App traces header propagation | Requires header preservation | I4 | CI/CD | Automates ELB config rollouts | IaC and pipelines | Prevents manual drift | I5 | Certificate Mgmt | Manages TLS cert lifecycle | IAM secrets vault | Automate rotations | I6 | WAF | Protects from attacks | ELB rule integrations | Tune to avoid false positives | I7 | CDN | Offloads static content | Cache and origin shielding | Reduces ELB egress | I8 | Autoscaling | Adds/removes targets | Target group hooks metrics | Prevents saturation | I9 | DNS / Global LB | Routes to regions | Health checks and routing policies | Use for geo-failover | I10 | Cost Monitoring | Tracks ELB costs | Billing and tagging systems | Alerts for unexpected egress
Row Details (only if needed)
- None
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
What is the difference between ELB and an API Gateway?
ELB focuses on traffic distribution and TLS termination; API Gateway adds features like auth, rate limiting, and request transformations.
Can ELB do rate limiting?
Typically ELBs do not provide advanced rate limiting; use API Gateway or WAF for rate control.
How do I handle TLS certificate rotation safely?
Automate with a certificate manager, validate in staging, and perform staged rollouts with health checks.
How quickly do ELB config changes propagate?
Varies / depends on provider and change type; small rule changes usually apply in seconds to minutes.
How should I pick health check timeouts and intervals?
Balance detection speed against false positives; add a warm-up grace period during scale-ups.
Are ELB access logs enough for compliance?
Access logs are valuable but combine with application logs and SIEM for full compliance posture.
Can ELB route by request content?
Layer 7 ELBs can route by host and path; deeper content inspection often belongs to API gateways.
How do I measure ELB impact on SLOs?
Include ELB success rate and latency in the service SLI and attribute errors through tracing.
Should I place ELB in front of a service mesh?
Yes for north-south ingress; avoid duplicating routing logic across ELB and mesh.
How do I handle sudden traffic spikes?
Use autoscaling, warm pools, caching at CDN, and pre-warming if supported.
How many healthy targets should I maintain per AZ?
At least two is common for redundancy; depends on risk tolerance and SLOs.
How to debug sticky session imbalance?
Check cookie settings and distribution; prefer stateless backends if imbalance persists.
Can ELB be used for internal services?
Yes; internal ELBs are common for private clusters and cross-account architectures.
What observability is required for ELB?
Metrics, access logs, and tracing with header preservation are minimums.
Is it okay to chain ELBs?
Generally avoid chaining unless required; it adds latency and complexity.
How do I test ELB changes safely?
Use blue/green or canary deployments and controlled traffic shifting.
What limits should I be aware of?
Varies / depends on provider; check your cloud provider docs for quotas and connection limits.
When should I move from managed ELB to custom proxy?
When you need advanced application logic not supported by ELB or need extreme customization.
Conclusion
Elastic Load Balancing ELB is a foundational cloud component for routing, TLS termination, and availability. Properly instrumented and integrated with autoscaling, observability, and CI/CD, ELB reduces incident impact and speeds delivery. Treat it as a platform dependency with clear ownership, automated operational tasks, and inclusion in SLOs.
Next 7 days plan (5 bullets)
- Day 1: Inventory ELB endpoints and enable access logs for all critical services.
- Day 2: Define or revise SLIs/SLOs that include ELB success rate and latency.
- Day 3: Implement health-check alignment and add grace periods for autoscaling.
- Day 4: Create dashboards for executive and on-call needs; set key alerts.
- Day 5–7: Run a small canary deployment and a targeted load test; document runbooks and automate certificate rotation.
Appendix — Elastic Load Balancing ELB Keyword Cluster (SEO)
Primary keywords
- Elastic Load Balancing
- ELB
- Managed load balancer
- Load balancer architecture
- ELB 2026 guide
Secondary keywords
- ELB best practices
- ELB metrics SLO
- TLS termination ELB
- Health checks ELB
- ELB autoscaling
Long-tail questions
- How to set up Elastic Load Balancing for Kubernetes
- Best SLOs for ELB-backed services
- How to monitor ELB latency p95 and p99
- How to automate TLS certificate rotation for ELB
- How to perform blue green deploy with ELB
- ELB vs API Gateway for microservices
- How to debug TLS handshake failures on ELB
- How to reduce ELB egress costs for media services
- What are ELB health check best practices
- How to run chaos tests for ELB failover
- How to preserve tracing headers through ELB
- How to scale ELB under sudden traffic spikes
- How to enable access logs and analyze for ELB
- Steps to migrate from single ELB to multi-region load balancing
- How to configure sticky session cookies securely
Related terminology
- Listener
- Target group
- Health check
- Sticky session
- TLS offload
- Path-based routing
- Host-based routing
- Global load balancer
- DNS failover
- Connection draining
- Warm pools
- Circuit breaker
- Rate limiting
- WAF
- CDN
- Service mesh
- Ingress controller
- Blue/green deployment
- Canary release
- Observability
- Access logs
- Metrics retention
- Tracing
- OpenTelemetry
- Autoscaling
- IaC
- Certificate manager
- SLO
- SLI
- Error budget
- p95 latency
- p99 latency
- 5xx errors
- Active connections
- Idle timeout
- Cross-zone balancing
- Config propagation
- Role-based access control
- Audit logs
- Cost monitoring
- DDoS protection